Spot on
leilani dowding 🌸🚜 ☮️@LeilaniDowding
A perfect 3 and a half mins of fact!!!
@danwootton@Cobratate
Embedded video
3:34
527.2K views
From
GB News
7:15 PM · Dec 19, 2022
https://twitter.com/LeilaniDowding/status/1604993747799789568
So sorry baker, so very sorry, I haven't shit the bread for 4 years.
How may breads are you gonna repeat this? There is no rage here! Pathetic
Yup, I will never forgive myself
Not gonna happen, have you whats happening in the EU?Communists and NWO don’t want patriotism.
https://twitter.com/ConceptualJames/status/1605361389148966912?s=20&t=vKFO85zFHdGh-afFK5GKRw
Michael P Senger1 of 3
4h • 50 tweets • 17 min read
THREAD – Nuremberg 2: What a Real Inquiry into the Response to COVID Would Look Like
Given the magnitude of the harm that’s been done, the public deserves to know exactly who knew and did what, when, and why in the days leading up to the lockdowns of spring 2020 and beyond. 1/ Image
Though it may not be politically feasible, ideally an inquiry into the response to COVID would take the form of an international tribunal. Below are just some of the many disturbing questions to which any leader who claims to represent the public ought to demand answers. 2/
-
Why did the CDC suddenly adopt “measures to increase social distance” as official policy in 2004, contrary to all the epidemiological guidance it had developed throughout the 20th century? 3/
-
Who was behind the campaign to export the concept of “lockdown” to Liberia and Sierra Leone in 2014? 4/
michaelpsenger.substack.com/p/bombshell-te…
-
Some intelligence reports have indicated that members of the western national security community were aware a new virus had emerged in China by fall 2019. What was being said about the virus at that time? 5/
-
If some national security officials had been worrying about a new virus in China since fall 2019, how could they have possibly believed China’s two-month lockdown of Wuhan eliminated the virus several months later? 6/
-
Lockdowns had been ruled out by the pandemic plans of the WHO and every developed nation. Why weren’t these pandemic plans followed? 8/
-
Why were health security officials talking about “curfews of indefinite duration” by February 24, 2020? 9/
-
Why does the WHO’s February 2020 report rely on flagrant logical fallacies in its promulgation of China’s lockdown measures as global policy? 10/
-
Former White House COVID Coordinator Deborah Birx has made conflicting statements about how she got her job. The former Deputy National Security Advisor offered her a job in the White House as far back as Nov 2019. How was Birx chosen for this? 12/
-
Who was behind the terror campaign of fake videos showing Wuhan residents spontaneously dying and convulsing in the streets in January and February 2020? 13/
revolver.news/2021/02/how-ph…
-
High-level national security officials have stated that Covid came from a lab in Wuhan. At the same time, high-level scientific officials have stated it is “molecularly impossible” for Covid to have come from there. Why the disconnect? 15/
-
Why has overwhelming peer-reviewed evidence that COVID was already spreading globally by fall 2019 been so widely downplayed by federal officials and major media outlets? 16/
-
Reports have revealed that military leaders saw COVID as a unique opportunity to test propaganda techniques on the public. Who advised western leaders to use military-grade propaganda on their own people? 17/
-
Some officials in the UK later expressed contrition about the fear campaigns that the UK Government used on its own people to convince them to support Covid mandates. How was the decision to use these fear campaigns made? 18/
-
Who was behind the massive bot and astroturf campaigns to popularize lockdowns among western citizens and officials in March 2020? 19/
-
How many deaths were caused by the WHO’s initial guidance on mechanical ventilators, which cited Chinese journal articles advising ventilators as the “first choice” for those hospitalized with Covid? 20/
-
The initial guidance from the WHO advised using mechanical ventilators not necessarily for the patient’s benefit, but to control the spread of the virus. Why was the WHO advising doctors to violate the Hippocratic Oath? 21/
-
Why were numerous, credible predictions of famine, human rights disasters, and economic collapse as a result of lockdowns ignored at the time they were implemented? 22/
1607425359229890560.jpg
Thread by @MichaelPSenger on Thread Reader App
threadreaderapp.com
2 of 2not 3
-
Why was natural immunity to COVID so long downplayed? 23/
-
Why were initial seroprevalence studies demonstrating COVID’s ubiquity downplayed? 24/
-
Why were beaches and other outdoor spaces closed? 25/
-
Why was the public kept in the dark about low early estimates of COVID’s infection fatality rate? 26/
-
What was the source of the guidance to move patients who were still sick into nursing homes? 27/
-
Remdesivir and midazolam were initially widely used, but didn’t lead to positive health outcomes. How was the decision made to use these over other treatment protocols? 28/
-
Leading officials have made conflicting statements as to whether the goal of lockdowns was to eliminate the virus, slow the spread, or buy time for vaccines. What was the actual goal they had in mind at the time they implemented these policies? 29/
-
Why did key public health officials make statements about using the response to COVID to advance non-health-related policy goals? 30/
-
How was the decision made to suppress and censor scientific opinions that dissented from lockdowns? 31/
-
Why were so many federal officials so intimately involved in the censorship of dissenting COVID opinions on social media? 32/
-
Why were social media executives given Top Secret US Security Clearances for purposes of censoring content, and what was the vetting process, if any, for these clearances? 33/
-
Why were federal officials working so closely with Twitter to censor legal speech by American citizens while an AI expert with deep ties to the military of America’s chief adversary was on Twitter’s Board of Directors? 34/
-
Why did elite western newspapers, media networks, and public health leaders so diligently repeat the absurd line that China had eliminated Covid by shutting down one city for two months? 35/
-
Why were mechanical drones initially deployed by various states and countries to monitor lockdown compliance? 37/
-
Why did masks shift from being not advised to being mandatory? 38/
-
The New York Times confirmed that at the standard cycle threshold level used for PCR testing, 85 to 90% of Covid cases were false positives. How did this practice become standard? 39/
-
Why were widely-known and publicized problems with PCR testing and comorbidities ignored for purposes of counting COVID deaths? 40/
-
Why did key public health officials so quickly shift from saying vaccines would prevent Covid to saying proof of vaccination should be mandatory to partake in everyday activities? 41/
-
Why has there been so little public discussion of China’s influence on the global response to COVID, despite the FBI Director’s disclosure that Chinese officials were “aggressively urging support for China’s handling of the COVID-19 crisis?” 42/
-
Why were governments across the western world so deferential to Neil Ferguson and Imperial College during the response to COVID, despite Imperial having the closest relationship with China of any western university? 43/
-
Why has the editor-in-chief of the Lancet been so publicly deferential to China? 44/
43/ Why did Bill Gates express such admiration for China’s response to Covid? 45/
44/ How did a 40-year member of the British Communist Party with no background in epidemiology become a leading advisor to the UK Government on COVID, and why was she recently promoted to lead the WHO’s nudge unit? 46/
-
Why did economists at leading universities assume that a short, sharp lockdown would “eliminate the resurgence risk” when the policy had no precedent? 47/
-
Why did politicians and public health officials demonstrate so little concern for following their own COVID rules? 48/
-
If COVID was actually deadly enough to kill millions and justify an indefinite state of emergency, why has so little effort been expended to hold China accountable for its initial coverup of that virus? 49/
Though many in positions of power would prefer we forgot, the strict lockdowns that consumed the world in 2020 are extremely well documented. Until we have real answers as to how exactly they happened, and why, we won’t be living in a real democracy. /end
https://mobile.twitter.com/MichaelPSenger/status/1607451668530237440
Bioweapons on Biolabs
https://twitter.com/DrJBhattacharya/status/1607483968588517376?s=20&t=0-TtHuq_lrQR9fmdCXJU3g
Holy shit, Elon gave all of these scientists and doctors evidence to suenot only the twitter board, but the federal government, CDC, FDA, NIH, NIAH, WHO, Fauci, Collins, professional organizations that punished them, etc. Etc. Etc. WW
This is gonna be fun!
https://twitter.com/MartinKulldorff/status/1607405287887208448?s=20&t=0-TtHuq_lrQR9fmdCXJU3g
WTH is jordan Peterson waling up? Wow
Sure the ones that have around for 20 or 30 years. Do these supposed respected outlets ever feel shame or self loathing?
26 Dec, 2022 14:37
Key ally hints at Boris Johnson comeback
The former prime minister will be the Conservative Party’s only hope if it suffers defeat in local elections, Nadine Dorries said
An electoral humiliation in May could see former UK prime minister Boris Johnson return to office by next Christmas, ex-culture secretary Nadine Dorries has told the Express. Dorries remained one of Johnson’s staunchest supporters even after he was ousted from Downing Street in July.
“I think there is a chance if the polls keep sliding by this time next year we will see Boris Johnson back in Downing Street,” Dorries told the British newspaper on Monday
Dorries reasoned that Prime Minister Rishi Sunak’s low popularity, coupled with the prospect of defeat in local elections in May, will make Conservative MPs realize that they owe their political careers to Johnson, who in 2019 steered the party to its largest majority since 1987 under Margaret Thatcher.
“Many of the people who were anti-Boris realize they are nothing without their seat,” she continued. “They have no voice, no one is interested in what they will have to say, not even down at the job center.”
Johnson resigned in July following months of scandals centering around the breaching of his own coronavirus lockdown rules. While a wave of resignations within his own cabinet helped push Johnson out, his replacements – Liz Truss followed by Rishi Sunak – did little to resurrect the party’s popularity with voters.
According to a recent poll, the Conservatives would lose almost 300 seats if a general election were held immediately, and the Labour Party would storm to a 314-seat majority. According to the poll, Sunak would not just lose the premiership, but forfeit his own Yorkshire constituency.
The upcoming local elections will not directly threaten Sunak’s grip on power, but will serve as a barometer of public opinion on his government. A resounding defeat will likely embolden Labour to call for a general election before the scheduled date of January 2025. Labour leader Keir Starmer demanded a general election in October following Truss’s resignation.
"I think the local elections in May are going to be absolutely difficult for us but Rishi won't walk,” Dorries told the Express.
Dorries backed Johnson throughout the ‘Partygate’ scandal and accused Sunak and other key Tories of orchestrating a “coup” to remove him from office. Since stepping down following the appointment of Truss in September, Dorries has been working on a book about Johnson’s “downfall,” and is expected to be named on Johnson’s resignation honors list and awarded a peerage.
https://www.rt.com/news/568950-boris-johnson-return-dorries/
(Boris set them all up to fail)
26 Dec, 2022 21:11
Ukraine calls for UN-brokered ‘peace summit’
(UN is corrupt and Useless)
Russia would only be invited after facing international prosecution, says Foreign Minister Dmitry Kuleba
Kiev has proposed holding a so-called "peace summit" by the end of February to mark the anniversary of Russia's military operation against Ukraine. The initiative was announced by Foreign Minister Dmitry Kuleba, who also set out Ukraine's conditions for inviting Moscow to the event.
In an interview with AP published on Monday, Kuleba admitted that while Ukraine will do whatever it can to win its ongoing military conflict with Russia in 2023, diplomacy will play an important role. "Every war ends in a diplomatic way," Kuleba said, adding that "every war ends as a result of the actions taken on the battlefield and at the negotiating table."
The minister added that the UN was "the best venue for holding this summit, because it is not about making a favor to a certain country" and suggested UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres as mediator for the event.
"He has proven himself to be an efficient mediator and an efficient negotiator, and most importantly, as a man of principle and integrity. So we would welcome his active participation," Kuleba said about Guterres.
Asked about the matter of inviting Russia to this "peace summit," Kuleba insisted Moscow must first face an "international court" and be prosecuted for supposed war crimes. He also dismissed Putin’s recent calls for negotiations, stating that everything Russia does on the battlefield "proves" that Moscow does not want to talk.
Earlier this month, Ukrainian President Vladimir Zelensky addressed G20 leaders in Indonesia and laid out a ten-point "peace formula," which includes the restoration of Ukraine’s territorial integrity, the withdrawal of Russian troops, an "all for all" prisoner swap, and a tribunal for those Kiev accuses of aggression.
Russia, meanwhile, has insisted that Kiev must "recognize the reality on the ground" as a prerequisite for any peace negotiations, including the new status of Donetsk, Lugansk, Kherson and Zaporozhye as parts of Russia
https://www.rt.com/russia/568965-ukraine-un-peace-summit/
Zelensky is insane and full of himself
26 Dec, 2022 18:53
Indian police investigate death of Russian MP
The politician who was visiting India as a tourist has died after apparently falling from a hotel’s third floor, police have said
(Why is it always falling from hotel floors, or down the stairs? Are intel setting up a conspiracy theory on Russia? It’s doubtful Russia would be so obvious, eh?)
A Russian regional MP from the central Vladimir Oblast, Pavel Antov, died on Monday, while visiting India as a tourist, Russian and Indian media have reported. The circumstances of his death are still being investigated.
Antov’s death was confirmed by the Vladimir Oblast legislature’s deputy head, Vyacheslav Kartukhin. He did not provide any details about the incident, which he only described as "tragic circumstances." Kartukhin also referred to Antov as a "successful businessman and a philanthropist." The deceased MP was a member of the ‘United Russia’ party – the nation’s largest political organization.
According to India’s NDTV, the 65-year-old was found lying in a pool of blood outside a hotel in the eastern Indian city of Rayagada last Saturday. He was traveling with a four-member tourist group and had checked into the hotel last Wednesday.
Another Russian tourist, Vladimir Bydanov, 61, died in the same hotel last week. According to the Russian Consul-General in India, Aleksey Idamkin, Bydanov suffered a heart attack. He also said that the Russian Consulate is in "constant contact" with the relatives of both men and the police. "The police do not see any criminal aspects in these tragic events,"the diplomat said.
A senior police officer told NDTV that Antov’s death might have been a suicide. The police also said they were investigating all potential versions of the incident, including accidental death. According to the police officer, the man was "in a depression due to the death of his friend."
Some Russian media also referred to Bydanov, who was a businessman from the Russian central Mari El Republic, as Antov’s "friend." The two men were reportedly traveling together.
https://www.rt.com/russia/568961-russian-mp-die-india/
26 Dec, 2022 16:35
One of UK's ‘most powerful warships’ longer in repair than at sea – The Times
The HMS Prince of Wales has suffered a series of costly failures since its launch in 2019
The British Royal Navy’s largest ship, the HMS Prince of Wales aircraft carrier, has spent more time docked for repairs than on duty since it was commissioned in 2019, The Times reported on Monday. The vessel is currently sitting in a Scottish dockyard with a broken propeller shaft.
The £3.2 billion ($3.8 billion) warship has spent only 267 days at sea since entering active duty in December 2019, the newspaper reported, citing Ministry of Defense figures. Christmas Eve marked the 268th day it has spent undergoing repairs.
In a lecture earlier this month, Admiral Sir Tony Radakin, chief of the Defence Staff, admitted that the carrier has been a source of “deeply frustrating” problems. Such megaships “are massive capital projects where sometimes things will go wrong,” Radakin added.
The Royal Navy describes the Prince of Wales as “one of the most powerful surface warships ever constructed in the UK.” Capable of launching NATO’s latest F-35B multirole combat aircraft, its flight deck is 70 meters wide and 280 metrers long, and with aircraft onboard it takes a crew of around 1,400 to operate.
The carrier’s malfunctions began with two major floods in 2020. The second flood filled the engine room with thousands of gallons of seawater, resulting in the Prince of Wales missing a planned trip to the US and returning to its home port of Portsmouth for six months of repairs.
The carrier managed to sail to Gibraltar in 2021, but disaster struck again a year later when it broke down shortly after leaving Portsmouth en route to the US this August. Engineers discovered damage to its propeller shaft, which naval officials reportedly blamedon the crew forgetting to grease it adequately.
A Royal Navy spokesman told The Times that repairing the damaged shaft will take until Spring 2023, after which time the Prince of Wales will return to Portsmouth to undergo more “pre-planned maintenance.”
The Labour Party has condemned Britain’s Conservative government for allowing the ship to repeatedly break down on its watch.
“We need our fleet at sea, not stuck in dock,”shadow defense secretary John Healy said. “HMS Prince of Wales is a NATO flagship and ministers cannot allow problems to undermine the ability of our armed forces to lead joint exercises.”
https://www.rt.com/news/568955-uk-aircraft-carrier-repairs/
(Definitely trolling)