>>18023761

>>18023785

only one mention of "total control" - related to MSM

>>18023825

It is no coincidence that Elon Musk is dropping evidence that the FBI colluded to fix the 2020 election RIGHT before the Brunson case is to be heard by the Supreme Court, which alleges that Congress did nothing to investigate collusion to fix the 2020 election; thereby, engaging intreason

>>18023846

Question:

IF the SC rules in favor of Brunson and by some miracle Congress and Biden admin are removed, who performs the functions of Congress in their places? Who will be acting president and VP?

Humor me instead of "not gonna happen"s, pls.

>>18023866

>That's a LOT of faith

It's all we have atm. Given the collective theme of Q posts in their entirety (which is congress will be removed/mass arrests), my faith in what's habbening is restored after discovering the Brunson case since that is precisely what will happen given a favorable ruling.

>>18023910

Outcome is not a function of your impatience.

>>18023763

Read the comments. People are awake.

>>18023918

>This runs from the Vice President to the Speaker of the House of Representatives, President pro tempore of the Senate, and then through the Cabinet secretaries in a sequence specified by Congress.

I believe all of those members are listed in the case as defendants; therefore, would not be able to act as president.

>>18023957

Yeah it'd be better if these guys ran the world

>>18023918

LLoyd Austin and Garland are neutral / Independent?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_line_of_succession#Current_order_of_succession

>>18024147

yes, it is

>>18024150

>>18024147

Do you think it's a coincidence that the outcome of a favorable ruling in the Brunson case would yield the EXACT outcome of the collective theme of Q posts: mass arrests ?

>>18024162

Ten days to be precise

1/6. Welcome to the board newfuck.

>>18023918

Anthony Blinken is NOT listed as a defendant in the Bruson case

He would be acting president if the Brunson's win the case.

>>18024227

"Do you trust the chain of command?"

I do not.

>>18024247

Q proof re. Brunson case before the Supreme Court.

>>18024281

>Case if after new congress is sworn in, speaker will be someone else.

Yes - correct. Forgot about this.

>>18024288

>Don't think so anon.

The result of the Brunson case is PRECISELY this: mass arrests.

So either Q made an extremely lucky guess or the team did know "what is coming". Those are the only choices.

>>18024288

Do you think SC justices discuss cases with their wives?

https://www.businessinsider.com/ginni-thomas-thought-biden-crime-family-would-be-sent-to-barges-off-gitmo-2022-3

Why it's habbening

• Elon Musk releases devastating evidence of FBI meddling in federal elections days before 1/6

• Brunson case going before the Supreme Court

• "Sessions" was the gatekeeper who was responsible for getting Brunson case in front of SC

• Q identified the Supreme Court as the decision makers for mass arrests

• Jinny Thomas - wife of Supreme Court Justice alerted Mark Meadows that 'the Biden crime family' and 'ballot fraud co-conspirators' would be 'living in barges off GITMO to face military tribunals for sedition,'

fight meh

>>18024330

We DO have it all. All the indicators are there - undisputable.

>>18024336

https://www.businessinsider.com/ginni-thomas-thought-biden-crime-family-would-be-sent-to-barges-off-gitmo-2022-3

>>18024336

https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2022/09/30/ginni-thomas-jan-6-committee-election-stolen-clarence-supreme-court-trump-huppke/8131825001/