>post credentials
>(you)s
right doge
you gotta tell em what u mean
you baked one and offered handoff
you don't want to handoff to that baker?
then ghost
once you offer handoff, it's open
Being open means to bakers who offer
Next time, hang onto to the bake until you're done
It's all about the BAKE and good coverage for Q's BOARD.
Doge, when you do something to be "open" you have to be open. Offering the bread is not just a symbolic gesture.
Your baking is appreciated but not taking it upon yourself vet bakers. If you don't like a baker and think he's around, then do not offer up the bake.
PLEASE STEP DOWN.
Doge is a fine baker. His work is appreciated. But we ask bakers to observe a few simple rules - if they do, they can bake. Don't have to be perfect, don't have to be popular.
It is appropriate. Admins work closely with regular bakers, they have the chance to talk about things, but nobody gets to play favorites. Offering the bake isn't just when it's your baker friend wanting to pick it up.
Big drama?
Why?
Next time, keep the dough until you are willing to give up the dough to any taker or willing to ghost if not.
Look at the OP, baker.
Hope can be a blessing or a curse. Sometimes better to look within to find the courage to carry on in the face of things not fully understood or easily controlled.
>>18040088 Police searching for anonymous rescuer who helped strangers trapped in the snow
notable
>When will the gaslighting end?
Just wrote that email, how'd it get posted so quick?
Apologies are not for BO, they're for anons. The baker I learned from strongly emphasized this, because it's about the respect we pay to one another and to Q.
Lots of laughs but our purpose is not a joke. Free speech matters. Why we've gotten attacked for six months straight.
Doge didn't get taken out.
He can post. He can bake. Just can't bend the rules because he doesn't like the baker after offering the bread up.
nice job, baker
Take a look at this one tho:
>>18039942 Freedom’s Future Requires Understanding the Past
Posted by Gary.
never posts more than one line - uses it to make nasty cracks about boomers and jews. Often repost the same wo/the commentary and with more substance.
Then usually delete the original as spam.
Which i will do after posting.
TYB
Freedom’s Future Requires Understanding the Past
December 29, 2022
Too few Americans, even among the liberty-loving, exhibit sufficient understanding of America’s smaller-government past to articulate a realistic smaller-government future. Many libertarians can parse doctrinal differences between Hayek, Mises, Rand, and Rothbard, but few can accurately describe how American society functioned before the rise of the paternal state during the New Deal. That needs to change, if America is ever to regain its original, limited-but-efficient system of governance.
Liberty is perhaps best positioned in money matters. Scholars like George Selgin and Larry White have explained how commodity monetary systems like the classical gold standard, and competitive markets in media of exchange, worked in the past. They understand the benefits and pitfalls well enough to step in with policies and products, should the current fiat system collapse.
Some scholarly articles and books about private governance have emerged, but so far the literature barely scratches the surface of the historical lessons available to us. Although Milton Friedman and many others pointed to how it might be possible for markets or private clubs to supplant government in various instances, the discussions tended to be theoretical rather than grounded in verified, empirical examples from other places or times.
Consider, for example, the lengthy debate over the extent to which lighthouses are public goods, in the economic sense of being non-rivalrous and non-excludable. Thanks to research by bona fide economic historians like Vincent Geloso, we now know that purely private lighthouses existed. They were eventually crowded out by governments, the monopolies of which were later justified on the historically ignorant premise that lighthouses are pure public goods and hence a service that only governments can provide….
https://www.aier.org/articles/
We can only report and discuss what we find or figure out. What would you like to brainstorm?
When bakers are new or returning, they have no idea what the current setup is. Doesn't mean they will never know. Or that we won't have to revise guidelines sometimes. The guidelines here are still minimal compared to other sites.
>ID changes.
yes, that's the chans. Most anons prefer anonymity across threads, but there are tradeoffs.
Shills will do anything to throw sites into chaos. Anons sometimes create chaos, we are not perfect. It's a constant effort to keep the flow open and address problems. Worth it because who else does what we do here?