Regarding heavy metals in dark chocolates: I have now been following Natural News and Mike Adams for quite some time. As a former quality auditor and quality inspector for 3 different American manufacturers, I pay attention more to actual test results than to various seals and certificate of approval.
What I like about products carried by "The Health Ranger" is that it appears actual testing of the food products is being done. As far as I know something can be labelled "organic" but still have pesticide residues and/or metals or other contaminants. The organic label appears to indicate only that the grower/producer submitted the right information to USDA to demonstrate their production methods were "organic". The documentation could be bogus and/or the product could still be contaminated.
I noticed someone's remark about California Prop 65 warnings. Those bother me, too because I think they are intentionally used to generate fear, in other words it could be part of a smear campaign against disfavored industries or products. The Prop 65 warnings don't contain enough information for comparison or perspective, in my opinion.
One of the best and fastest growing business opportunities, in my opinion, would be independent lab facilities testing food products for pesticide residues and metals. Not just food, either, but soils used in agriculture.
Animal culling for "flu" is bogus in my opinion. We now know PCR testing amplifies bits of DNA for detection but can't "diagnose" an infection. PCR testing used to cull animals is similar to the "COVID" testing debacle, I think.
It could be that healthy animals are getting culled so that at some point all livestock will be "mRNA" injected with a similar brain-dead rationale as was used to off people with a case of the flu (ventilators, no early treatment, no antibiotics) and then introduce a real bioweapon: mRNA jabs.