>>18905203
SO we are just suppose to accept Horowitz's conclusion that there was no political bias?
>>18905203
SO we are just suppose to accept Horowitz's conclusion that there was no political bias?
We are learning parts of the report were indeed redacted by the IC. So, Horowitz is saying RR did not changed the report. Technically, it is the report he approved of after the IC got done with it.
But, that does not change the fact that Horowitz testified there was no political bias and we know there was. There is no way I'll ever trust these agencies again. They are playing word games and slow walking justice.
If there was true justice, he would live long enough to see his name smeared thru the mud.
Going before Congress is a waste of time. Serves no purpose. We are trusting they are being investigated. That's all that really matters.
More than that. We don't know the full extent of what was classified.
My biggest question is why Q led us to believe RR revised and redacted the report.