Hahahah

What a joke. Youtube has put an age retriction on the video where loy brunson is simply speaking about how he and brothers got their case before scotus. Youtube

tells you that you must sign in to view. No sex, no violence, no cursing. So the link in this post is for rumble. Cannot get it to post. Anyhow share it however you can.

2022.10.25

dcc meeting challenging the Immunity of congress.html

millions of people do not use social media

but still use email

email every email address you come across

email so it gets seen

very good info regarding brunson case jan 6

get it viewed

get it spread this week

https://rumble.com/v1q1emh-2022.10.25-dcc-meeting-challenging-the-immunity-of-congress.html

read:

Brunson v Adams -

An Average Person's Understanding of a Supremely Important Legal Case

DECEMBER 19, 2022

https://michiganconservativeunion.org/blogs/news/brunson-v-adams-an-average-persons-understanding-of-a-supremely-important-legal-case

>>18054077

https://michiganconservativeunion.org/blogs/news/brunson-v-adams-an-average-persons-understanding-of-a-supremely-important-legal-case

of an Oath of Office and the Importance of States Rights (if you can carve out one hour and two minutes, I highly recommend that you listen to this entire presentation made by Loy Brunson before the entire world of media descended upon him … it is very informative from start to finish and without all the noise from the media).

https://rumble.com/v1q1emh-2022.10.25-dcc-meeting-challenging-the-immunity-of-congress.html

Also, the Brunson brothers are requesting that we send letters of support for this case to the US supreme court. The address of the supreme court is as follows:

Supreme Court of the United States

1 First Street, NE

Washington, DC 20543

Send separate letters to the attention of the chief justice John G, Roberts, Jr., associate justices Clarence Thomas, Sonia Sotomayor, Samuel A. Alto, Jr., Elena Kagan, Amy Coney Barrett, Neil M. Gorsuch, Brett M. Kavanaugh, Ketanji Brown Jackson informing all of them that you support this case. And send a copy to the Brunson brothers so that they know you sent your letter. The address to send their copy to is:

The Brunson Brothers

4287 S. Harrison Blvd., #132

Ogden, UT 84403

FINAL THOUGHT ON CASE 22-380: Mr. Brunson's case before the supreme court talks about the Object Principle of Justice and the Equitable Maxim that he says “kills” the Object Principle of Justice on Pages 7 and 8 on this supremely important supreme court case – this concept is so rich that it deserves a commentary all its own. So stay tuned!

>>18054082

>>18054077

Many of us have already heard about the interesting case that worked its way through the lower courts of Utah and has found its way to the United States supreme court. Its called Brunson v Adams et.al., and it addresses the National Security Threat that the November 3, 2020, (stolen) election represents – that’s Logic.

The plaintiff (or person bringing this complaint before the court) is a man named Raland J. Brunson who is representing himself (praise God) along with his brothers Loy and DeRon. The defendants (the people Mr. Brunson is petitioning against) are 388 public functionaries (defined as persons elected or appointed to a government position of limited authority to conduct a particular constitutionally-based function for the public); namely the (illegally installed) Biden/Harris twosome, the now lame-duck speaker of the house Nancy Pelosi, the Vice President Mike Pence (I use the present tense because I firmly believe he is still the legitimate Vice President of the United States of America) and 384 public functionaries elected to the US congress seated during the November 3, 2020, election (coup d’etat).

All 388 of these above-mentioned persons have sworn an Oath to Protect and Defend the United States Constitution, as many of us have also sworn that same Oath.

The list of authoritative references used in this case are shown as the Table of Authorities on page 9 of the PDF copy of the Brunson case linked here:

https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22-380/243739/20221027152243533_20221027-152110-95757954-00007015.pdf

In a nutshell this case states that these 388 individuals were warned about a “highly covert swift and powerful enemy” that was “seeking to destroy the Constitution and the United States” and they did nothing to stop it thereby committing treason and fraud (Page 3 of actual Proceedings – which is on Page 12 of the above-linked PDF copy) - That’s the Law.

>>18054093

Some of the highlight arguments in this case – which I believe should be a “case-study” case include:

1) The US and State Constitutions do not “grant rights to People” rather they “restrict the authorities granted to government by the People and they protect the rights of the People.” (Page 5 of the actual Proceedings – which is on Page 14 of the above-linked PDF copy). We should have our Children repeat this argument over and over again until they have it memorized.

2) Fraud makes everything it touches void. The word that attorneys and judges like to use rather than void (in a seeming effort to confuse the community about what is actually being said) is “vititates” but all that word actually means is to make void.

So in common language what Mr. Brunson is saying is that the excuses that the lower courts used to try to skirt their responsibility to hear this case were of no effect. And, of course those excuses included the usual ones:

bad timing

no standing

lack of jurisdiction

immunity

You know. We the People have heard them all before, and We the People have allowed the courts to get away with using them for the longest time. I pray that time has come to an end.

>>18054098

This case is brilliant. In it, on Page 6 (Page 15 of the PDF copy) it states that because of the strengths of the facts of this case, Mr. Brunson felt no need to provide the supreme court with the defendant’s opposing arguments (I believe conversely it is because those arguments are so weak and without merit).

Mr. Brunson then asks for Immediacy in the supreme court because the National Security Threat continues on a daily basis.

One of the remedies that Mr. Brunson asks for, on behalf of every citizen of the USA, is the removal from office of all the above-mentioned public functionaries.

And, although this particular case before the supreme court does not specifically ask that President Trump and Vice President Pence be reinstated as the rightful winners of the November 3, 2020, election, it is requested in the original case that the lower courts dismissed on technicalities.

Guess What? On November 23, 2022, “the government” waived its right to respond to the petition on this case, unless requested by the court. I suggest that this means that “the government” can’t find holes in these arguments – and that’s Liberty!

>>18054103

Apparently the supreme court is holding their private hearing on January 6, 2023, to decide how to publicly address this case.

Here’s a link to an interview of brother Loy Brunson discussing the background of his brothers Raland and DeRon. their historical cases and the Power of the United States Constitution, as well as the Value of an Oath of Office and the Importance of States Rights (if you can carve out one hour and two minutes, I highly recommend that you listen to this entire presentation made by Loy Brunson before the entire world of media descended upon him … it is very informative from start to finish and without all the noise from the media).

https://rumble.com/v1q1emh-2022.10.25-dcc-meeting-challenging-the-immunity-of-congress.html

Also, the Brunson brothers are requesting that we send letters of support for this case to the US supreme court. The address of the supreme court is as follows:

Supreme Court of the United States

1 First Street, NE

Washington, DC 20543

>>18054105

Send separate letters to the attention of the chief justice John G, Roberts, Jr., associate justices Clarence Thomas, Sonia Sotomayor, Samuel A. Alto, Jr., Elena Kagan, Amy Coney Barrett, Neil M. Gorsuch, Brett M. Kavanaugh, Ketanji Brown Jackson informing all of them that you support this case. And send a copy to the Brunson brothers so that they know you sent your letter. The address to send their copy to is:

The Brunson Brothers

4287 S. Harrison Blvd., #132

Ogden, UT 84403

FINAL THOUGHT ON CASE 22-380: Mr. Brunson's case before the supreme court talks about the Object Principle of Justice and the Equitable Maxim that he says “kills” the Object Principle of Justice on Pages 7 and 8 on this supremely important supreme court case – this concept is so rich that it deserves a commentary all its own. So stay tuned!

Brunson

"They are all of our brothers".

Challenging the Immunity of Congress'

Spread this.

>>18054077

>>18054082

>>18054093

>>18054098

>>18054103

>>18054105

>>18054109

https://rumble.com/v1q1emh-2022.10.25-dcc-meeting-challenging-the-immunity-of-congress.html

https://michiganconservativeunion.org/blogs/news/brunson-v-adams-an-average-persons-understanding-of-a-supremely-important-legal-case