Anonymous ID: 217678 Jan. 2, 2023, 5:58 a.m. No.18058379   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8433

>>18058160

I think in earlier times you would be right but……………….the SCOTUS has several motivations in ruling for Brunson and a part of that motivation would be to bring to a stop the democrat's desire to pack the court. Everyone here knows that if they could, they would and given the first opportunity, they will. These degenerates don't fuck around when it comes to grasping as much power as possible and the end game for their agenda is damn close. They can taste it. Precipice?

 

The second reason why I think you're wrong is that the SC also takes an oath to protect and defend the Constitution from enemies foreign and domestic. They actually take two oaths. I think a message has been delivered to those that needed to hear it. Either way they rule, the defendants are taken down. It's a matter of whether or not those that rule against Brunson will join the rest of those traitors on those barges down in the Caribbean.

 

Also keep in mind the United States Solicitor General waived all rights on behalf on all defendants. This is unprecedented. I think she is well aware of what is getting ready to happen.

We find out shortly.