Anonymous ID: eb5aff Jan. 2, 2023, 1:18 a.m. No.18057800   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7803 >>7806 >>7828 >>8500

Anons,

 

Thanks to a link to a video sent from a friend, I came across this site and dug out a few related ones:

<https://justempowerme.com/who-is-kimberly-ann-goguen-aka-kim-possible/>

[Pic-rel} This screenshot is from a different site, focused on a short video explaining, "YOU ARE The Plan."

 

There are resonant themes between this concept and QResearch, including the proper use of WWG1WGA, and "Trust the Plan." The spin on "Trust the Plan" is, "YOU ARE The Plan." Therefore, trust yourself as the way to dig out of the globalist cabal's web of lies, evil and death.

 

My question for anons is, have you dug on this, and in your opinion, is it another trap like the Jan 6th visit to the Capitol after DJT's speech?

 

There have been SO MANY traps for individualist patriots over the past decades, I have become a bit jaded and suspicious about joining any physical gatherings purported to be focused on restoring individual liberty.

 

I also noticed some small yet significant errors betraying weak technical knowledge in the "Kim Possible" character who is supposedly at the very top of the hierarchy to restore individual sovereignty.

 

Over the years I've been mostly lurking, I've noticed and read many posts herein about "the Ascension," but also "messages from the Peiadians" and "messages from Sananda." I do not automatically toss all of these into the same credibility category.

 

I am sincerely interested in learning opinions from other anons on this. Kindly include what manner of resources you used to form your conclusion)s). Thank you!

Anonymous ID: eb5aff Jan. 2, 2023, 1:24 a.m. No.18057811   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7813

>>18057803

I'm asking for a quality/credibility rating from anons whose interest has gone beyond casual inspection/emotional reaction, to include some level of digging. I'm seeking for those anons' considered opinions and a brief description as to what resources contributed to their informed hypotheses.

 

I apologize to those anons who will complain this is a slide. I counter with the fact that it seems, in some ways, to relate DIRECTLY to many Q drops and to the main message of this movement throughout. It may, however, be another misdirection. Which is why I'm asking for anons' considered opinions if others have investigated this already, I haven't seen serious digs posted herein.

Anonymous ID: eb5aff Jan. 2, 2023, 6:42 a.m. No.18058609   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>18057977

I assume your comment was meant as ironic/rhetorical.

 

Still, I feel compelled to offer this: God is everywhere, suffusing everything - welcome or not, invited or not, acknowledged or not. The All That Is who created all we can know, observe, measure and hypothecate about is the source of, and therefore the essence of, everything in this Universe and any parallel or alternative Universes which may exist.

 

Given that inescapable and logical deduction, one might consider with awe and reverence the All That Is, whatever nomenclature you choose with which to refer to the Source of Creation.

Anonymous ID: eb5aff Jan. 2, 2023, 7:13 a.m. No.18058802   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>18058168

Codemonkey's candidacy was a psyop. I wrote to his campaign, offering to help as a volunteer. IF Codemonkey even HAD a campaign manager, no one ever even replied with a "no thank you" email. Could have been set up as auto-responder; could have been completely automated; did not necessarily require an actual human's time to reply.

 

Nevertheless, NO REPLY to a legitimate, heartfelt offer to voluntarily help w Codemonkey's campaign.

 

Living in Codemonkey's nominal constituency, I did not see a single yard sign, billboard, or newspaper campaign ad. Therefore, I conclude that his candidacy was a sham.