>This is where anons are sitting on the edge of Occam's razor.
Indeed. Killing each other is what [they] want us to do. Yet, our legacy is one of otherwise peaceful farmers and tradesmen provoked to armed combat.
>Reality contrast
Sonanon was at Great Lakes a few years ago. His class PT was interrupted by a recruit who asked if she could go to the galley to get a banana because she felt her potassium level was low.
Jan 6 is a conference day for the SC. Expect a conference. The SC justices talk about resolved cases and review pending petitions. They will discuss the Brunson petition. If four or more justices agree the petitioner deserves a hearing it will be scheduled. Keep it real, but always look forward to being pleasantly surprised, Anon.
Conference Days: The Justices meet in a private conference to discuss cases argued earlier that week. The Justices also discuss and vote on petitions for review. The building is open to the public but the Justices do not take the Bench.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/
https://www.supremecourt.gov/legendkeyinfo.aspx
>They know the music is about to stop. Q spoke of this.
MUSIC IS ABOUT TO STOP.
202-456-1414
Q
Call the White House. Phone Numbers. Comments: 202-456-1111. Switchboard: 202-456-1414.
https://www.whitehouse.gov/get-involved/write-or-call/
>so if the sun is a zillion miles away.
The current earth/sun distance is about 91 and 1/2 million miles, Anon. The average distance is 93,000,000 miles. In terms of the solar system that is not that far. The crepuscular rays in your pic are a natural phenomenon caused by gaps in the clouds and atmospheric scattering of light that originates from a radiant body.
>indoctrination is a heavy burden on the intellect
Agreed. Have an astronomical observatory (ExploraDome). Understand celestial mechanics. Have personal experience. What has anon not considered?
>at that distance it would just be straight light all over the earth, it would not have a direction to it like a street lamp spreading out.
You are discussing a point source. That is how starlight behaves. Our sun subtends about 1/2 degree, or about the size of a full moon. The light from our sun does not behave like a point source, Anon.
>the programming with certain key numbers
>and the lack of tools sufficient to actually measure the kind of distance you're touting as fact
Will pass on numerological coincidences, Anon. There are others much more qualified than I. With respect to the observable parallax of celestial bodies I will refer you to the work of Friedrich Bessell, from 1838, as well as subsequent researchers.
>it's all bullshit, anon
>everything you've been taught
Like every rational human being I have to take in and process what information I have access to. I see no harm in accepting Newtonian celestial mechanics. It's easy and accurate over small scales. It may not be current, or relativistic, or even popular among your crowd, Anon, but it does accurately predict the movement of objects in this solar system.
>btw, there are no coincidences
More power to you, Anon. Document your findings for the betterment of humanity.
>John Kerry lands in Antarctica, highest U.S. official to visit
>World Nov 11, 2016
Three days after the election. Who was he reporting to?
>hubris blocks discernment
So, argue against the use of Newtonian celestial mechanics to calculate the observable positions of celestial objects, Anon.