Anonymous ID: 81c26a June 18, 2018, 6:58 p.m. No.1806479   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1806400

 

They most certainly did!. They were afraid of treating her to harshly because she was going to be the President. There are other instances, but because they were not biased against her does not mean there was no political bias.

Anonymous ID: 81c26a June 18, 2018, 7:12 p.m. No.1806662   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1806608

 

Didn't appear to have any influence last week. They have just ignored it and made it out to be Potus as the bad guy. That will never change. They will not acknowledge this was an inherited problem. You can show proof positive and still they will deny. We are at a point where this is useless. Not going to convince many others if they haven't been convinced by now.

Anonymous ID: 81c26a June 18, 2018, 7:25 p.m. No.1806839   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1806815

 

was he here today? Sure was hoping not to see him back here ever again.

 

He/she is not nearly as smart as they think they are. SO easy to set them up, lol.

Anonymous ID: 81c26a June 18, 2018, 7:29 p.m. No.1806881   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6932

>>1806826

 

Good point. Include the FBI's IC and whoever else had a stake in it. I'm not holding my breath fpr transparency. We've already been told we'll be lucky to get 40% of it. Should be more like 80%.

Anonymous ID: 81c26a June 18, 2018, 7:34 p.m. No.1806951   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1806932

 

That seems to be the whole problem with classified materials. We really don't know if they are really for protection of assets or protection from illegality.