Anonymous ID: 3290b2 Jan. 4, 2023, 2:28 p.m. No.18075596   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5607

>>18075584

>218, so 6 more, and it's theirs. I am thinking that RINOs may just give it to the dems, rather than lose control of their grip.

mayb thas what RINOs want but can't be obvious about it

the counter is get cheap mccarthy in b4 that happens?

in this particular case, i don't want to fuck around and find out

kek

Anonymous ID: 3290b2 Jan. 4, 2023, 3:33 p.m. No.18076074   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>18076003

good eyes

also made me think:

infowars gave schitt a way out?

schitt in the future might be like 'I was protecting America against the QAnon wave because at the time we thought they were a threat'

the narrative is for Normies?

headlines are for Nomries/narrative control?

so Normies might be like 'leave schiff alone, its understandable that he was leery about QAnon so he did what he did'

does swamp turn Normies against Q+Q and Anons?

i think schitt and others used 'QAnon' to bury important info that would have saved American Lives; if true, then [they] betrayed Americans and should meet Justice