>>18075417 (pb)

Brunson: Tracy v Terry [Had IRL, who is Terry?]

Dear Adam Carter & Tracy Beanz

Adam and Tracy, you do not know the mind of SCOTUS in relation to the Brunson case and you have acted as if you do.

Adam and Tracy, this is a very strong and serious reason, our national security, compelling SCOTUS to grant Brunson’s writ. How did you miss this point?!

Adam and Terry, what makes you think you know what powers SCOTUS has and, does not have, under the Brunson’s case?

Adam and Terry, what you have said in your article is not factual.

Adam and Terry, Isn’t it a simple conclusion that anybody, I mean ANYBODY, who is found to be in a position to stop a war against America and refuses to do so can be found guilty of treason?

>>18076752

>Llink for the Beans article, Oop ed or whatever it is?

If you’ve seen this negative article about the case, Deron has given a response. We wanted to share his response here on the Telegram page.

https://www.uncoverdc.com/2022/12/30/the-truth-about-the-brunson-case/

https://t.me/s/BrunsonBrothersSCOTUS/245