Anonymous ID: 000000 Jan. 5, 2023, 12:03 a.m. No.18079376   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9386 >>9393 >>9416 >>9678 >>9753 >>9981 >>0026

>>18079341

>>18079333

She says she has common sense requests but never explains what those requests are? Boebert talks about the motion to vacate and McCarthy is bending to that request already. Stephanie is clearly dismissive, but her networks agenda kinda requires this I think. Boebert's strongest argument that she has brought to the press today is that republican voters didn't vote for the status-quo on the hill, and this is true. McCarthy represents the status-quo to an extent. Like I've said, I support Boebert and the 20 but its damaging to the movement to have someone with no clear answers address the media. Gaetz was far clearer, even as he informally addressed a Twitter Space tonight. Optics are important, and at least in my opinion Boebert is failing on the optics front.

Anonymous ID: 000000 Jan. 5, 2023, 12:16 a.m. No.18079408   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9412

>>18079401

>Giving Hannity the ass whooping of his life did not impress anon?

 

Yeah I talked about this last bread. I completely heard it the other way around. I felt Sean had her backed in a corner almost. And as I've said before, I'm a Boebert fan, but her media stuff today just seemed weak. But who knows, thats just my opinion.