Anonymous ID: 0ec3f6 Jan. 5, 2023, 12:43 a.m. No.18079497   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9502

>>18079461

>>18079448

First, I completely forgot this was part of Hannity's revived "Hot Seat" segment, so all of this could mean nothing and was just a ratings thing. Sean talks over Boebert suggesting a consensus candidate. Boebert has brought forward multiple names who her and the 20 would consider. Seems Sean wants to press her to just name one specific person that she wants as speaker, but to be fair she has kinda of answered this question already. After this being my fifth re-watch of this interview, it seems Sean just wants Boebert to name one person the 20 want, or what it would take for her to vote yes to Mcccarthy. Both of them seem kind of intentionally aggressive to each other, and as I said, I assume this is for ratings for Hannity. That;s my two cents.

Anonymous ID: 0ec3f6 Jan. 5, 2023, 12:50 a.m. No.18079510   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9527

>>18079505

>She argued plenty that is worth listening to.

 

Please anon tell me what you think I am missing! I've listened to this multiple times and I just don't hear anything new or relatively important. I'm honestly interested to hear what you think I've missed.