> then military is only option
The only option for who, Anon?
The SC accepts about 3% of petitions during weekly conferences held on Fridays throughout the year. They will review the Brunson petition tomorrow during a routing weekly conference. They will review other petitions as well. On Monday - or early next week - they will release the results of the review of petitions. If four or more justices agree that the Brunson petition deserves a hearing, a hearing will be scheduled.
>routing
*routine. Sorry.
Oh. The Brunson case was submitted under a rule that allows cases to skip portions of the appellate process. The justification used for that was 'national security'. What a lawyer claims in a filing or petition as part of an overall legal strategy can be significant, however prior to a court decision it is not legally significant.
>>The only option for who, Anon?
>Well someone's boot has to stomp on our face forever.
Al Gore's famous 'There's no controlling legal authority' defense comes to mind. If the United States Supreme Court allows due process up to the review of a petition in conference but decides that petitioner does not merit a hearing - as it routinely does for 97% of the 5,000 petitions it 'reviews' annually - who is in place to police the Supreme Court?
There's no light source for the illumination on her left cheek, Anon. Compare the light on her left cheek with the light on her right breast. They need to agree for your photoshop skills to improve.