dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

lawfag here seems to be a major error by brunso who promoted this rule 11 idea

what makes you think this is a rule 11 CASE? THE CT OF APPEALS entered a final judgment and brunson filed petition for writ of cert (review)

with the SC

not rule 11 which says

Rule 11. Certiorari to a United States Court of Appeals before Judgment

A petition for a writ of certiorari to review a case pending in a United States court of appeals, before judgment is entered in that court, will be granted only upon a showing that the case is of such imperative public importance as to justify deviation from normal appellate practice and to require immediate determination in this Court. See 28 U. S. C. § 2101(e).

>>18086561

>Brunson vs Adams Et Al

>Sessions = SCOTUS Rule 11

sauce rule 1it aint rule 11

butif it is is yuge

but its not

>>18086659

loy is not a lawfag

the rule 11 story is wrong

ONLY applies to take a case direct to SC

read the rule faggots

loy had a judgment entered in 10th circuit

says so in brinson petition

what isnt in brunson petition?

rule 11

here read it faggots

https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22-380/243739/20221027152243533_20221027-152110-95757954-00007015.pdf

heres rule 11 again for anyone still huffing the brinson hopium pipe

Rule 11. Certiorari to a United States Court of Appeals before Judgment

A petition for a writ of certiorari to review a case pending in a United States court of appeals, before judgment is entered in that court, will be granted only upon a showing that the case is of such imperative public importance as to justify deviation from normal appellate practice and to require immediate determination in this Court. See 28 U. S. C. § 2101(e).