In 1953, President Eisenhower let Nelson Rockefeller re-design executive department security structures. Much to Eisenhower’s dismay, the Rockefeller brothers removed US presidents from control of alien-related programs.[…]

By drawing exclusively from the Rockefeller-controlled Council on Foreign Relations to form the PI-40 group, which controlled alien-related programs, Rockefellers were stealing control of the human future from elected leadership, unknown to the general public.

And by building a lush retreat for the PI-40 group, Rockefellers were deepening their influence over alien-related programs. […]

Nelson Rockefeller then maneuvered himself into a role as Eisenhower’s coordinator for the CIA, plus a role in a secret planning group that would attend to clandestine dirty work without letting Eisenhower know about it. But why were Rockefellers so eager to take control of alien issues away from US presidents, thus making subsequent human-alien interactions secret?

https:// www.bibliotecapleyades.net/exopolitica/esp_exopolitics_ZZZZZZZK.htm

>>181056

>PI-40

Nice catch

Since 1966 every CIA Director has belonged to the Council on Foreign Relations. The CFR/CIA Directors are; Richard Helms (1966-73 Johnson), James R. Schlesinger (1973 Nixon), William E. Colby (1973-1976 Nixon), George Bush (1976-1977 Ford), Adm Stansfield Turner (1977-1981 Carter), William J. Casey (1981-1987 Reagan), William H. Webster (1987-1991 Reagan), Robert M. Gates (1991-1993 Bush), R. James Woolsey (1993- Clinton), and John Deutch, who replaced Woolsey as CFR member Clinton's CIA Director.

sauce http:// www.bilderberg.org/roundtable/CIA-LtdHng1.html

should be in batter -→ https:// youtu.be/cDCfTIapds0

Since the end of World War Two the Central Intelligence Agency has been a major force in US and foreign news media, exerting considerable influence over what the public sees, hears and reads on a regular basis. CIA publicists and journalists alike will assert they have few, if any, relationships, yet the seldom acknowledged history of their intimate collaboration indicates a far different story–indeed, one that media historians are reluctant to examine. […]

When seriously practiced, the journalistic profession involves gathering information concerning individuals, locales, events, and issues. In theory such information informs people about their world, thereby strengthening “democracy.” This is exactly the reason why news organizations and individual journalists are tapped as assets by intelligence agencies and, as the experiences of German journalist Udo Ulfkotte (entry 47 below) suggest, this practice is at least as widespread today as it was at the height of the Cold War. […]

xFurther, why do prominent US journalists routinely fail to question other deep events that shape America’s tragic history over the past half century, such as the political assassinations of the 1960s, or the central role played by the CIA major role in international drug trafficking?

Popular and academic commentators have suggested various reasons for the almost universal failure of mainstream journalism in these areas, including newsroom sociology, advertising pressure, monopoly ownership, news organizations’ heavy reliance on “official” sources, and journalists’ simple quest for career advancement. There is also, no doubt, the influence of professional public relations maneuvers. Yet such a broad conspiracy of silence suggests another province of deception examined far too infrequently—specifically the CIA and similar intelligence agencies’ continued involvement in the news media to mold thought and opinion in ways scarcely imagined by the lay public.

The following historical and contemporary facts–by no means exhaustive–provides a glimpse of how the power such entities possess to influence if not determine popular memory and what respectable institutions deem to be the historical record.

list/sauce here http:// www.globalresearch.ca/the-cia-and-the-media-50-facts-the-world-needs-to-know/5471956