Anonymous ID: 6280f8 Jan. 6, 2023, 7:30 a.m. No.18088831   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>18088806

difference between a case based on facts and a case based on hoping someone interprets the law "correctly". case based on facts (such as who voted to ignore problems with elections) requires no interpretation. thus justices hands are tied on this one.

 

previous cases did not use facts, used legal interpretation, leads to endless pilpul and "no standing"

 

all previous cases submitted by BAR attorneys who left loopholes. part of their game.

 

you are shill but have now been used. feel it.

Anonymous ID: 6280f8 Jan. 6, 2023, 7:38 a.m. No.18088866   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8960

>>18088858

and even if they are "attorneys" they have a loyalty to a foreign power (BAR, inns of court, City Of London DBA The Crown), and thus have a biased opinion and motive to obfuscate.