true af. wow
"The Brunson Petition for a Writ of Certiorari would require the votes of only four justices to move the case forward."
So…what are the chances it goes forward?
>Ask yourselves a simple question. Why are there so many voices on here that their only posts are anti-vax narratives?
Echo chamber pressure. They NEED people to die to prove their knucklehead theories and avoid dents to the ego.
>To me being a pureblood would be having never gotten a single vaccine since birth
Exactly. The anti-COVID vaxxers here are too sanctimonious to realize this.
There isn't a person in America who went to public schools who is a "pure blood"
>who were homeschooled have the slightest chance of being a pureblood then?
I didn't go to private/parochial school but I believe they were not required to vaccinated? Someone interject here.
>Not sure what’s dumber Brunson hopium or shills getting vaxxed.
You're vaxxed too, dumbfuck. There is nothing you can do about it. Being born means you're vaccinated.
>They rule Nay, they have violated their oaths and will join the other 388 defendants in being removed.
None of the justices are listed as defendants though - so how can this be?
>you are a fucking simpleton who does not have the slightest clue of how judicial oaths work.
They already refused to hear the Trump case of voter fraud - so why weren't they removed then?
So if they vote to NOT hear the case today, they get removed from office today. Thanks ;)