>>18091317 lb/pb Amicus briefs in Brunson received after distribution deadline

>Well. That's just crazy. Literally NO ONE even knew about this case until after it was accepted.

It's not about numbers:

"An amicus brief that only reiterates a party’s arguments and otherwise offers nothing new has no value to the court."

Also, the Brunson's lawyer(s) likely sought out pertinent amicus briefs that bolster the case. These would have been filed with the petition:

"In what circumstances should a party consider soliciting the participation of an amicus?

Before asking an amicus to participate in an appeal, a party must first assess whether the case presents an important issue that will have broader importance beyond its impact on the parties. If an appeal turns on a discrete factual dispute or a conventional but undecided legal question, an amicus brief likely will not meaningfully assist (or receive much attention from) the court. But in cases raising novel issues that might have broader legal or public policy implications, an amicus brief can be a useful tool for potentially impacted persons or groups to weigh in."

https://www.sullcrom.com/files/upload/LIT_AugSep16_OfNote-Amicus.pdf

>>18091416

>Q the FF op.

Yup. Much easier to pull off than a school shooting. Operation power substation is on their FF agenda as well.

>>18091462

>they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

That's the inflection point. We have not reached it yet. We each declare those causes to the void independently. Hence the need for our collective awakening.

>>18091489

>Scissoring doesn't make a baby, does it?

There are many ways to squeeze a turkey baster, Anon.

>>18091515

>So there's that.

Absolutely. Conference today. Announcement on Monday.

>>18091548

>Are (You) fuckin' kiddin' me?

>We are WAY past that.

Are you working on a new Declaration of the people's grievances yet, Anon? Didn't think so? When we the people write the next one is the inflection point anon was referring to. It hasn't happened yet.

>>18091668

>(You) go ahead and write that strongly worded letter.

No one can do that alone and see that our fellow citizens are well represented. Hence the need for an awakening to our common need to take the next step.

>>18091963

>What is the marker that the highest ranking anons who at this point will still defend trusting the plan to the point of attacking anyone who questions it would use to consider normies “ready”?

Anon, writing words on a screen is not "attacking" someone. The 'marker' is an awakened population that stops supporting the active insurgency:

"They only need the active support of a few enabling individuals, but the passive acquiescence of a large proportion of the contested population will give a higher probability of success. This is best achieved when the political cause of the insurgency has strong appeal, manipulating religious, tribal or local identity to exploit common societal grievances or needs. Insurgents seek to gain control of populations through a combination of persuasion, subversion and coercion while using guerrilla tactics to offset the strengths of government security forces. Their intent is usually to protract the struggle, exhaust the government and win sufficient popular support to force capitulation or political accommodation. Consequently, insurgencies evolve through a series of stages, though the progression and outcome will be different in almost every case.]"

Q

>>18091975

>Military intelligence has better things to do than monitor an image board.

"Within MILDEC, conduits are information or intelligence gateways to the deception target. Conduits may be used to control flows of information to a deception target."

https://jfsc.ndu.edu/portals/72/documents/jc2ios/additional_reading/1c3-jp_3-13-4_mildec.pdf

>>18092097

>the US military psy-op playbook was weaponized against the US populace

o7

Functions of MILDEC include:

• Causing ambiguity, confusion, or misunderstanding in adversary perceptions of friendly critical information.

• Causing the adversary to misallocate personnel, fiscal, and material resources in ways that are advantageous to the friendly force.

• Causing the adversary to reveal strengths, dispositions, and future intentions.

• Conditioning the adversary to particular patterns of friendly behavior to induce adversary perceptions that can be exploited by the joint force.

• Causing the adversary to waste combat power with inappropriate or delayed actions.

https://jfsc.ndu.edu/portals/72/documents/jc2ios/additional_reading/1c3-jp_3-13-4_mildec.pdf

>>18092149

>when will the tards

Who are the tards, Anon? Don't hold back.