the amicus briefs were filed after nov 30 distribution for conference.
to show that they were filed? tried reading them and they were gibberish.
read them. looked like the "new california state" guys were trying to screw things up for the brunsons. not even close to the cogency of the brunson writ and pompously ordering the court around.
https://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=214549
Here was the gibberish, and it's not the amicus briefs. The amicus briefs look sensible enough.
here is the possibly related case where plaintiff is asking Roberts to recuse
https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/22-6123.html