>>18097660

She might be but she’s alienated a lot of people that support her publicly and on the Bannon War Rooms. She was absolutely hopping mad, saying she didn’t care what the posse said, (they didn’t support McCarthy) and went off screaming about the 5-6 that went to 20 that opposed McCarthy. It was not an act.

Even Bannon was surprised but he never lets on. He and the posse have been very gracious and supportive, so there was no reason to literally insult them.

I’ve never liked her that much but I think she needs to tone things down when working with allies.

She seems to think being in DC for two years makes her a senior politician, she was convinced by McCarthy all the bad things that would happen if they didn’t elect him, most of it wasn’t true! And she didn't listen to the 5+ that have been there a lot longer than her. She has immature arrogance, I’m sure she’ll learn, but she’s not my cup of tea.

The pic with Bannon is when he delicately said the war room couldn’t understand why she was supporting McCarthy. Her look says it all, she’s always courteous with Bannon. Her head blew up after he finished, she ranted non stop for seven minutes.

>>18097624

I think the public finally got to see how disfunctional and dishonest the House and many members are. I might be wrong but I still have a sense McCarthy won’t be there long, or if he is, his hands will be tied and he’ll be constantly monitored.

I know I learned a lot about how the sausage is made, and sabotaged.

PN>>18096778, >>18096870, >>18096956, >>18096943 McCarthy's first shitty speech as Speaker + analysis

If I didn’t know McCarthy is fucking corrupt as hell, I suppose this speech would be semi inspiring.

PN>>18096778, >>18096870, >>18096956, >>18096943 McCarthy's first shitty speech as Speaker + analysis

All I can see im my head is this video

If I didn’t know McCarthy is fucking corrupt as hell, I suppose this speech would be semi inspiring.

>>18097789

They actually allow criminals in the house, remember the judge that got disbarred because he was so corrupt, well he got elected to the house the next year. They’ve got to tighten up the laws for anyone who has any public corruption and its been proven, stealing money from local governments, etc should be barred.But the very best limiting factor would be require an IQ test and if not over 100, they can’t be therethe average IQ there is on the line of being retarded

PN>>18097058 AG Bailey from Missouri dropping receipts on Biden's admin censoring true Covid info.

Here’s the 9 part thread, I’ll post 6 attachments after

https://twitter.com/AGAndrewBailey/status/1611568518612254722?s=20&t=kmIjA5AVIJwgvmdJ4plgDw

>>18097977

Attachments + couple more

>>18097994

Last couple

>>18098005

This is outrageous,they are blaming the companies on their electoral efforts, they didn’t censor enough, not only covid

It’s being looked at the highest levels

I hate everything to do with these creatures in the WH, WHO their complaints are you must do more. Its not enough google youtube censored 70% they want it down to .05%

How did these companies justify this?

>>18098097

They say “their platform was responsible for election skepticism and the insurrection”

Reincarnated Nazi’s, no wonder they gave no problem with Zelensky and Ukraine, banning religion and churches. They are Satanists

>>18098071

Yeshe agreed “Vote to Vacate the chair” only one person can call for McCarthy to go, and it will be done. Pelosi removed it because all the progressive communists were threatening het

>>18098138

She is a genius and is held to the highest level of the law, she will not lie, cheat or steal. She is on par with the justices and is appointed to the Judicial and Executive branches. This is not like a dumb US Atty.

She can certainly side with the petitioners if the law is clear. She is not just like a defense atty since she is assigned to two branches of gov, only the VP works for two branches from my recollection. President of the Senate and VP of US. No one else can do this. Its an extremely unique position

>>18098125

Yes she can side with the plaintiffs. there are pros and cons I’ve looked at by bringing her in. But she will have to do the right thing. It’s a huge sign that she didn’t challenge the case on behalf of lawmakers. It could be exceptionally good or bad for Brunsons. My sense is its good

>>18098251

Those dictating these policies know they kill people, nothing us done for the people’s protection