>>1809685 (PREVIOUS)
>>1810010 (PREVIOUS)
>>1810046 (PREVIOUS)
The facts are the part your talking about deals with
refraction errors at those angles.
That's all. Why calculate refraction errors for a flat earth
at all if flat earth does not exist?
Math to complicated for nasa to figure spinning ball earth?
kek
THINK!
What is your model of the sun?
Sure they would be simpler… but why don't they factor in purple
unicorns deviating the light? Because it's fiction?
I thought flat earth was fiction? Simplifying the math
from round to flat earth may make things easier…
but WRONG if on a ball. Simple as that.
There would be no need. No benefit to calculate
theories based on fiction.
Ask Yourself… Why?
Because I know the truth and therefore have hope
and comitment unto that truth.
FE leads to God… or God leads to FE??
Depends who you are.
No you're a shill.
No you are.
No you are.
No you are.
No you are.
No you are.
No you are.
(A day in life of a qanon)
Even if you are right in that we are wrong about the
condition of our world you are wrong
to assume us shills. I am a college educated veteran
who has comited considerable time in research.
In other words, I am at least sincere if nothing else.
I've already learned what you're learning now. Long ago.