no
Rule 11 filing is what caused SC to contact them to address formatting, etc. and to re-file
When 10th Circuit found out, to cover its ass (or maybe SC contacted them to get off their asses), the made a decision.
That allowed Brunsons to re-file under normal rule.
Similar to Kari Lake case, in which the SC of AZ indicated it might take up the case and bypass court of appeals there. Court of appeals then issued its ruling.
Moves and countermoves, anon.
we'll find out Monday, so this is just a pissing match, but… I can't help responding when you are completely missing the elephant in the room here.
the SC scheduled it on J6. the clerk called them to tell them to hurry up so they could get it in conference. unless you believe they are lying, this itself is notable.
also, I believe them when they said they filed it originally under Rule 11. logically, then, this means that the SC called them to address filing issues it on the basis of Rule 11. again, notable.
likely that the 10th Circuit noticed and/or was contacted to issue its decision in the interim.
God help this board if I ever decided to start shitposting drunk.
would be 10x more retarded than ebot
07 anon. Live life one day at a time. Maybe tomorrow will be your first day sober again.