my fav were the women who showed up as engineers just to meet a husband.
they were fully paid for in college and then commissioned upon exit, put in as luitentants, and then started dateing.
they were put in with the engineers but they really didn't do anything but date the men looking for a husband and then, when they found one, they'd resign their commission and do the wife of an officer bit . . .ROTC affirmative action
can you please sauce your 'biden isn't president' talking point.
He really seems to be.
TY in advance
you neglected to put down any reasons.
add this one: you won't be there is they join a military outfit.
that's a plus!
how creepy to say that.
who is unnerved?
I merely point out that your psy-opping the board.
you keep your narrative in the creep zone to try and make others emulate your creepiness.
you want a confrontation.
you want the topic to be about what you mention.
you pretend to be in conflict with the other one.
what rules? I merely point out what you do.
and then you turn into 'taskmaster' demanding that others explain or admit to your mischaracterizations.
what do I care about you?
just throwing a wrench into your fan.
now you're distracted and propabaly have lost the thred of what you were doing before by attacking me.
whatever, you're obvious.
how does he seem upset?
there is no tone of upset in his post.
you're just making up stuff or taking talking points from a list.
the
"everything wrong in the world is the fault of the anons because of slanders presented : 'f-d up theories'"
sliding cretin
No, anon, the world was around and messed up beyond belief long before the anon were even born so you fail.
you are of the same kind as the 'nothing anyone ever does is good enough' slanderers
sauce it or shut up.
by the way, I don't agree with your blame game.
in that kind of deal what it is: anyone with an awareness of things wrong is faulted for not having solved it or for not knowing full details.
am I wrong for still wanting you to shut up?
you didn't do a comparison, you only showed annecdotal stuff from 10 years ago.
this same argument could be used to say that fracking causes no long term harm, that the fractors will fill up with veins of calcite
huh!
everyone weeped and was sad and upset and it was big news every single time it happened and that's why there are still news reports about it ten years later!
fills up the air with escaping methane, I suppose.
why put it on me? you're the one with the strong need for your idea to be dominant
I'm just telling you that you aren't being fair to those who you were badgering.
my interacting with you has stopped you from that badgering so I did what I wanted to do.
I have no source, anon, I'm not hear to verify your assumptions, but perhaps to show you how to be a bit kinder in your presentation.
?
there is not a group think here, anon.
you assume one, and you are incorrect in that.
you are talking to the wind with your generalizations about the board.
by the way challanging people is fine.
a 'board attack' is a flood of nonsense and shill posts. You are not doing that.
is that so?
one most point:
you say "we all know it"
and you must know that
provokes people to say
no, there is not a group think here.
but the shills, and you aren't one, right?, are desparate to play it like it's them against the group think of reactionaries of the board.
"me and you against the world" is a bit of a paranoid stance, no?
you posted 8 times.
that is not a flood.
how much more descernment, in a shit-posting venue like this, does one need to present?
you assume everyone is against you.
in fact many must feel that the whole
'you took the vax, now you are permanently damaged' presentation is rather odious and horrid.
You should have posted Olivia