wtf

later is not an option

>>18106900

i've got a bible, honey

hock your wares elsewhere

how does mos have so many and so much?

faux = mos / [SA] = damn, you too, kleigh?

>>18107129

following orders is not an excuse

>>18107006

didn't the candidates have a congressional vetting? so, if congress allows them into office and then states the individuals, singularly or collectively, have no "code of ethics", what does that say of those who gave the green light?

>>18106626

where do you embed YOUR sleeper cells?

BRICS