Anonymous ID: d6ea40 Jan. 9, 2023, 9:10 p.m. No.18114776   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

Ahhhโ€ฆ.

Now it makes senseโ€ฆ

We were rejecting their attempts at redefining what being anon is, so rather than bombarding the board with spam and memes, they've decided to bring halfchan shills over in an attempt to redefine the culture of the board into something they can control.

Couldn't quite put my finger on what I was missing about the tactic until now.

Anonymous ID: d6ea40 Jan. 9, 2023, 10:02 p.m. No.18115007   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>18114992

Thank you for calling, but I'm afraid that Q is busy at the moment and is unable to respond. If you could just leave your full name, email address, and a brief message then I'm sure he will get back to you at his earliest convenience. Thank you, and have a pleasant evening.

Anonymous ID: d6ea40 Jan. 9, 2023, 10:32 p.m. No.18115101   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

From austere religious scholar to typical vanilla chan shill in one post when called out. You can see the switch in opposing personalities in one post and then back. His emotions allowed his real personality to appear. KEK!

Anonymous ID: d6ea40 Jan. 9, 2023, 10:36 p.m. No.18115112   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

Can't help but notice how the board slows down when a comment on what and how they're posting shows up. Interesting. I'll bet they can't wait until anons start playing with their heads.

Anonymous ID: d6ea40 Jan. 9, 2023, 11:07 p.m. No.18115204   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5222

>>18115150

>Usually when people make claims about God they're willing to answer questions.

Seeing as you're the one pontificating on the subject like you're the best expert on the subject here tonight, why are you a shill? You should be willing to answer that question seeing as you're the one making all the claims about God tonight on the board. You a priest IRL or something?

Anonymous ID: d6ea40 Jan. 9, 2023, 11:36 p.m. No.18115304   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5311

>>18115294

So you don't address what I've said, just cherry-pick and hide behind more Q crumbs, like those back up your argument in any way. Good plan. You do realize this attempt at board manipulation has been tried before, right? That anons have seen this movie before that you're trying to show us. But you keep on, keeping on, dumbfuck. My job is done.

Anonymous ID: d6ea40 Jan. 9, 2023, 11:40 p.m. No.18115322   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5328

>>18115311

>You're projecting that I'm a shill

Do you know how to use that word properly? I'm not projecting that you are a shill, I'm flat out calling you a shill. I would think you would have been smart enough to discern the difference. Apparently not.

Anonymous ID: d6ea40 Jan. 9, 2023, 11:59 p.m. No.18115378   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5387

>>18115372

>I've been here since CBTS.

No, you haven't.

>some of us aren't mindless followers trying desperately to fit into the crowd.

KEK. And other Anons are the mindless followers? Or just me? Followers of what? What makes you so special compared to other anons?

Anonymous ID: d6ea40 Jan. 10, 2023, 12:10 a.m. No.18115417   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5421

>>18115410

What truth did you repeat? All I saw was shill bullshit.

> Repeating nonsense like trying to attack a post over "reddit spacing" because others do it so you have to do it too. That's being an NPC.

No, that's called a tell. Trying to associate the word groomer with NPCs. TOP FUCKING KEK!

Anonymous ID: d6ea40 Jan. 10, 2023, 12:28 a.m. No.18115457   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>18115443

No, you and your dumbfuck backup are trying to minimize the word groomer by claiming it has been used too much and it is now an NPC word. Now have a quick discussion in your Discord channel to formulate a response to this post.