>>1808166

TY but you forgot the sauce, here it is:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/how-a-dubious-russian-document-influenced-the-fbis-handling-of-the-clinton-probe/2017/05/24/f375c07c-3a95-11e7-9e48-c4f199710b69_story.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.0101267dd139

So once again, if (((they))) want to get out in front of a damaging story, (((they))) get their fake-news waterboys to write a piece debunking it in advance.

It's much like that NYT story about really convincing fake videos, which they published at the height of the rumors about the HRC vid allegedly showing her abusing a child (did Q link to that, or was it an anon? I can't find it right now)