๊EK
>Give Glory to God
>Natives don't have religion
>we have Spirit
I don't care what you call your delusional fantasies. Kek
>that would be your belief in the "science delusion"
Are you so retarded that you call the scientific process a delusion?
Or are you trying to imply that if I don't believe in a God I must blindly believe the mainstream Scientism? Kek
You too.
May the Giant Spaghetti Monster watch over your meatballs.
o7
>N'Joy Your Miserable Existence Thenโฆ
Must be projection.
I'm not the one thinking there is some utopia on the other side of this life if I just follow the rules good enough.
>It is a mysterious thing, the loss of faith-as mysterious as faith itself.
"Loss" implies it was there to begin with. But you wouldn't have faith if someone didn't tell you about God.
Also, you are aware that there are different Gods that are worshipped right? When did you lose your faith in Allah?
Only difference between you and I is that I just reject one more God than you do.
Okay buddy. Kek. (pic related)
Wrong.
Atheism = I don't believe your account of events, but make no assertions of my own.
Try replacing "nothing" with "magic" in your meme and then you got religion.
>You folks always come with the same bits.
Likewise.
>Do you find bothersome, the religiousness of Q?
I don't see Q as religious or rather religiosity having anything to do with Qs message. I know you do, among other reasons because he posted scripture and made reference to Christianity.
I know the enemy is religious.
If I find the religious anons here bothersome then? No. Interesting is a better word.
You are here because you accept that the world you live in is an elaborately crafted lie to keep you enslaved - yet the one book that has controlled your entire families brains for
generations has to be the one thing that it true.
This contradiction never ceases to amaze me.
>But, setting aside everything you think is true, is required to determine what IS true.
Impossible task. We are not objective beings. We can only hope to move closer to truth.
So in the end what I determine IS true, is really just what I believe to be true and I'm back at square one.
Accepting that one cannot ever truly know is the first step to true enlightenment.
>ah, the twit is back
Do I know you?
>not done pissing on the board users and mocking them with your know-it-all behavior and pronouncements?
I'm not pissing on anyone. I am however challenging your dogmatic views. If you get pissed off by that, that is on you.
Also, I'm not pronouncing to know-it-all. The opposite in fact. And neither do you.
>how do you know what books those anon have, or what their families were reading, or if they even could read, generations ago?
I don't, but I can make some assumptions from what they post and the general behaviour of religious people and splash of understanding of sociology.