Anonymous ID: 41dafe Jan. 10, 2023, 5:26 p.m. No.18119990   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9997 >>0020

>>18119926

Before Covid, “pure blood” was a highly arrogant term associated with breading and racial ‘purity’.

 

Re-appropriating the term for ANYONE (irrespective ethnicity) that resisted the intensity of the coercion…. i think is brilliant.

 

[they] HATE people that resist [their] coercion… and [they] were the ones historically fixated by the term ‘pureblood’. Not so easy for [them] anymore. Hehe.

Anonymous ID: 41dafe Jan. 10, 2023, 5:36 p.m. No.18120058   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0069

Maybe you have comprehension issues.

 

The term has been stolen FROM the eugenicists, and now mocks [them] for trying to kill billions of people.

 

Maybe not yet useful in all social settings just yet… but now, it means much more about a person’s countenance, and NOT ethnicity.

 

Okay?