Oh, look! It's the vax division faggotry again.
Clockfags are gay queers, though.
Not pro abortion, no. But both sides are definitely being disingenuous in their arguments. Just cut to the chase, already. We all agree we don't want to pay for abortions, and it should be apparent, by now, they aren't necessarily going to go away. SCOTUS reversal was the right decision in putting it in the hands of the States. Now, the States have the responsibility of giving people a path forward in doing what they must to act responsibly with their rights:
-
Use contraceptives.
-
If that fails, use levonorgestrel (it's OTC for fuck's sake).
-
If that fails, worse case scenario, do something before there's a heartbeat with your OB-GYN.
There's never even a reason for a woman to have to go to the doctor for this issue excepting extreme circumstances. This doesn't make me pro abortion, just pro sensible solutions. (You) cannot govern each person's life the way you see fit, and convincing the State to get involved in people's personal matters is authoritarianism. Asking the state to protect a new life after there's a heartbeat is sensible. However, before these States consider enacting a law that will put 1000s more in the State's care with adoption agencies that anons keep railing against as trafficking operations, ask yourself if it's more important to fix that issue, first, or the abortion one.
I don't have a problem with both sides getting their way, to an extent. What I have a problem with is this idiotic notion that every argument between anons and others is either black or white. That's not how society, or reality, works. I'll word it to you another way. When every child in CPS/State custody has been adopted into a permanent, not a foster, but permanent home, then perhaps society will be ready for a full on ban. Until then, people just aren't ready.
Based synopsis.