>>1813787 (LB)
hmm - maybe more going on???
Maybe something to this idea after all!:
>>1813720
>Also, given she was blackmailed, have thought that maybe there's a chance she could be flipped back if given an out.
Wow, BOOM!
Wonder if this is going to change the narrative, spin, timeline, whatever. Significant!
Does that mean her comment is off the record, not part of the recorded testimony?
But still a way to inject it into the broader narrative?
Ha, someone chatted her up in the hall on her bathroom break 10 mins ago.
Doubt it though, chances like that aren't part of the plan. This is far more structured and well executed than that.
Mr. Jeffries just said that "for the last few hours, we've sat in this hearing, and some of my colleagues, part of the Coverup Caucus, have attempted to peddle Conspiracy Theories, that the investigation into the Trump campaign's potential criminality, where we were attacked by a hostile foreign power, is a Witch Hunt. There is not a scintilla of evidence that a Witch Hunt exists right now. In fact, if any individual connected to the 2016 Presidential campaign was victimized by prosecutorial misconduct, her name was Hillary Clinton. The report that you've produced, 500 plus pages, makes clear, that the former FBI Director violated Department of Justice protocol on multiple occasions."
and on and on. KEK!