Anonymous ID: 85c256 Jan. 14, 2023, 3:44 a.m. No.18142252   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2267 >>2688

>>18142230

>https://www.the-sun.com/tech/7120565/artificial-intelligence-secretly-replaced-humans/

Artificial intelligence replaced humans in job role for months and ‘no one noticed’

 

A POPULAR news outlet has been publishing articles written by AI since November, keeping it on the down low.

 

Tech media siteCNEThas been publishing the articles since November, and lots of readers don't seem to have noticed.

 

“What is a credit card charge-off?” was the first AI-written article, published on November 11 by CNET Money.

 

The portal has reportedly churned out and published 73 AI-generated articles since then, reports Futurism.

 

“This article was created using an AI engine and reviewed, fact-checked, and edited by our editorial staff,” reads a note on the website under the headline, date and author/editor credits.

 

The publication mentioned on its website that it doesn’t compromise on its journalistic integrity and that a team of editors is involved in the editorial process “from ideation to publication.”

 

Ironically, Jackson Ryan, a reporter for the tech and news site wrote an article on the website last month where he said that journalism jobs are safe from being pounced on by technology when talking about ChatGPT and artificial intelligence.

 

“It definitely can’t do the job of a journalist,” Ryan wrote of ChatGPT. “To say so diminishes the act of journalism itself.”

 

Social media users recently took to Twitter to discuss their shock at finding out about the AI writers.

 

One person said: "I'll admit I was quite taken aback to see that CNET is now publishing entire articles generated by AI – a grim inflection point in an already-bleak job market for journalists."

 

"The quality and structure of those articles is atrocious," added another.

 

The applications of artificial intelligence have taken the tech industry by storm but media outlets are exploiting it to the fullest.

 

Associated Press was one of the pioneers of applying AI to its newsroom and boasts about leveraging the technology on its website.

 

“Today, we use machine learning along key points in our value chain, including gathering, producing, and distributing the news.”

 

In the 2020 elections, The Washington Post used artificial intelligence for live campaign updates on their podcasts.

Anonymous ID: 85c256 Jan. 14, 2023, 4:13 a.m. No.18142319   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2912

>>18142270

> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0q2dgVuS2QY

we believed that Washington was broke.

The normal system of selecting leadership, in both parties, is based on the redistribution of lobbyist and special interest money.

If you wanna be the leader of your party, you have to raise and redistribute North of $100M.

 

And Kevin McCarthy was so good at that, he raised and distributed about half a billion dollars over the last election cycle. So it creates a covenant that's not really built on trust, or merit, or vision, but trading money for political support, and we wanted to send a shock to that DC cartel system and say no, there's got to be a different way you get there.

 

And the concessions we sought fell into 3 buckets:

policy - we wanted specific bill scoming to the floor, we wanted specific dates for when they would come to the floor, we wanted adherence to specific spending levels with a budget resolution, and the organizing principle of our policy goals was to make sure that we would never again get an omnibus bill.

 

That's just a total joke of a way of governing. How can we sit here and honestly say that bills that are thousands of pages long, that spend $1.7 TRILLION dollars and that you get 48 hour before having to cast a vote is really legislating. It's not. It devalues each individual member and it's insulting to our constituents to suggest that we even know what the hell we're doing when that's the way we run the railroad.

 

So that's policy. Second was procedure. Having those 72 hours to read the bill. Having open amendments. The youngest member of congress was not yet born the last time the appropriations process went through regular order. And that just means we should vote on the defense stuff seperately, and then vote on like the education stuff, and then vote on the Health and Human Services stuff, and then it doesnt just all get mushed together so somebody can vote for a bunch of bullshit that you wouldn't otherwise approve and say well, I had to vote for it to fund our trooops. That's the game, that's what the cartel builds and lobbyists make a gazillion dollars off of it.

 

The third leg is personell. In order to enforce the deal that we got we wanted specific people on committees in specific leadership posts, and what's the saying? You rob the banks because that's where the money is at.

 

We wanted far more representation on the appropriations committee bc that's where the money is. And a lot of Amerians dont know what the rules Committee is and why that's important but it totally governs what we get to vote and dont get to vote on , and so we demanded specific people on the Rules Committee.

 

People said you shouldnt have done that, you showed the country how rough and tumble this is, you should have done that behind closed doors.

 

I was like, to hell with that, man, behind closed doors is where the American people have been getting screwed

 

and so I wanted to level my complaint on the House floor,, I wanted to cite the people I was objecting to and their ascension to leadership.

 

Their are days in Congress where the only thing we vote on is….