I really hope anons look into this.
Here’s the correct answer with sauce:
The indictment or criminal prosecution of a sitting President would unconstitutionally undermine the capacity of the executive branch to perform its constitutionally assigned functions.
https://www.justice.gov/olc/opinion/sitting-president%E2%80%99s-amenability-indictment-and-criminal-prosecution
it shouldn’t come as any surprise, but apparently when democrats say “Nobody is above the law, not even the President”, they’re lying.
>impeachment, then trial.
>as I wrote.
>Criminal charges once the POTUS leaves office - as what they prepare for Trump
If a POTUS is impeached and removed, he’s not president when charged.
So you were actually wrong.
Twice.
Is “being wrong” your thing?
Is that what you do?
Come on q research and get things wrong??