Anonymous ID: 1acc99 Jan. 15, 2023, 12:08 p.m. No.18150103   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>18147216 pb

 

Saying there is "no proof" of a link between NFL player's cardiac arrest and the Covid19 vaccine - before the treating physicians have identified what caused it and in a culture where people are discouraged from doing so (told it could cause people to avoid the "life saving" measure when their reaction is merely a "fluke")*- is like saying there was "no proof" of election fraud in 2020 or 2022 five seconds after the races called when one side is holding all the evidence and not releasing it and all laws are designed to shut down successful challenges on technicalities in the supposed interest of the"stability of government transitions" and "not undermining the electorate faith in elections."

 

  • One example of saying the quiet part outloud:

 

"OSHA [has]suspended reporting requirementsthat normally would cause employers to report adverse reactions to the vaccine.

 

From the FAQ section of OSHA’s website:

 

Vaccine Related

 

[Q] Are adverse reactions to the COVID-19 vaccine recordable on the OSHA recordkeeping log?

 

[A] DOL and OSHA, as well as other federal agencies, are working diligently to encourage COVID-19 vaccinations. OSHA does not wish to have any appearance of discouraging workers from receiving COVID-19 vaccination, and also does not wish to disincentivize employers’ vaccination efforts. As a result,OSHA will not enforce 29 CFR 1904’s recording requirements to require any employers to record worker side effects from COVID-19 vaccinationat least through May 2022.** We will reevaluate the agency’s position at that time to determine the best course of action moving forward."

 

https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/an-osha-coverup-feeds-vaccine-conspiracy-theories/

  • citing - https://www.osha.gov/coronavirus/faqs#vaccine (emphasis added)

 

** suspended to May 2022 has now updated toMay of 2023!!!!!

 

https://www.osha.gov/coronavirus/faqs#vaccine

 

_____

 

See also -sitting U.S. Senator using disinformation to get truth tellers censored (alleging their disinformation):

 

"Getting Americans vaccinated is critical to putting this pandemic behind us. Vaccine disinformation spread online has deadly consequences,which is why I have called on social media platforms to take action against the accounts propagating the majority of these lies," Sen. Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn., told NPR.

 

https://www.npr.org/2021/05/13/996570855/disinformation-dozen-test-facebooks-twitters-ability-to-curb-vaccine-hoaxes (naming RFK Jr as one of the dozen speeding anti-vax "disinformation")

 

---—-

Facebook admits toremoving 16 million pieces of health information"

 

"We reacted early and aggressively to the COVID-19 pandemic by working with health experts to update our misinformation policyto target harmful claims about COVID-19 and vaccines, including taking action against some of the accounts in the CCDH report," spokesperson Kevin McAlister said in a statement. "In total,we've removed more than 16 million pieces of contentwhich violate our policies and we continue to work with health experts to regularly update these policies as new facts and trends emerge."

 

https://www.npr.org/2021/05/13/996570855/disinformation-dozen-test-facebooks-twitters-ability-to-curb-vaccine-hoaxes

 

______

 

And see:

 

FacebookWidens Ban On COVID-19 Vaccine Misinformationin Push ToBoost Confidence[in the vaccines]

 

February 8, 2021

 

https://www.npr.org/2021/02/08/965390755/facebook-widens-ban-on-covid-19-vaccine-misinformation-in-push-to-boost-confiden

 

_______

 

"….social media platformslike Facebook, myths and falsehoods about vaccines generally — and about the COVID-19 vaccine specifically —threaten to limit the impact of such a vaccine, by sowing doubt and mistrust among millionsof users, according to a new analysis by NewsGuard."

 

https://www.newsguardtech.com/special-reports/special-report-covid-19-vaccine-misinformation/

___

 

So, no,not having evidence yetof a vaccine injury or of election fraud (when the evidence is in the hands of people who won't share it and actively suppress any counter information) doesnot mean there isn't any evidence.

 

And the "no proof" mantra is tiresome and disingenuous. Reporters and politicians know better when they use it and each one should be held accountable.