>no definitive answer
It's learned to equivocate like a pro. Fake news is doomed.
You know what 51 is? 3 x 17.
"new systems"
Why should we tolerate the folks who helped engineer the previous debacle telling us what the "new systems" will be?
I never thought of the WEF as advancing the agenda of the CCP, but it sure looks like they are.
>are they killing all the old folks who have no next of kin by putting them in a refrigerator til they die of hypothermia, LIKE CUOMO DID?
Now that is uncalled for speculation. MIdazolam would be MUCH more compassionate than the freezer. Why would you think Cuomo and that ilk are that COLD?
I saw this article today. I have a question. Years ago a reporter by the name of Brian Deer had a significant role in destroying the reputation of Dr. Andrew Wakefield whose research suggested that the combo MMR (not separate vaccines) was leading to gut changes in children with autism. He was one of 13 authors on the vilified and retracted paper, but the only to face the massively disastrous professional consequences for his reasonable work.
Will the media now also face consequences for suppressing valid questions about the combo MMR vaccines?
Dr. Wakefield
Dr. Wake field
Dr. Wake-the-field?
Here's what an extremely quick search yielded:
https://briandeer.com/mmr/lancet-summary.htm