>>18155729

TYB

>>18155854

FightWithKash

1 hour ago

Kash Patel: The law firms in DC are worse than the lobbyist and that’s bad.

https://rumble.com/v25u8li-kash-patel-the-law-firms-in-dc-are-worse-than-the-lobbyist-and-thats-bad..html

Ancient Egyptian tomb dating back 3,500 years may be the final resting place of one of the QUEENS or princesses of the 18th Dynasty, experts say

PUBLISHED: 04:51 EST, 16 January 2023 | UPDATED: 05:00 EST, 16 January 2023

-The never-before-seen tomb uncovered in Luxor dates back around 3,500 years

-Academics believe it belongs to a royal of the 18th Dynasty of Pharaonic Egypt

-However the experts have not yet been revealed who and what is inside the tomb

Archeologists have uncovered an ancient Egyptian tomb dating back 3,500 years that may hold the remains of an 18th dynasty royal.

The never-before-seen tomb was unearthed by British and Egyptian researchers on the west bank of the River Nile, in the modern day Egyptian city of Luxor.

It's close to the Valley of the Kings, one of the country's main tourist attractions, situated next to the Giza pyramid complex.

Although the tomb is in a poor state of preservation, it could date to the era of famous Egyptian pharaohs Akhenaton and Tutankhamun.

However, who exactly is inside the tomb is a mystery – for now.

'The first elements discovered so far inside the tomb seem to indicate that it dates back to the 18th dynasty,' said Mostafa Waziri, head of Egypt's Supreme Council of Antiquities.

The 18th Dynasty of Ancient Egypt (1550 BC to 1292 BC) was the first dynasty of the New Kingdom, a period when Egypt truly became a global power.

Also known as the Thutmosid dynasty, it features some of Egypt's most famous pharaohs, including Tutankhamun, Hatshepsut and Akhenaten.

Piers Litherland at the University of Cambridge, head of the British research mission, said the tomb could be of a royal wife or princess of Thutmosid lineage.

They 'probably belonged to one of the royal wives or princesses during the period of Thutmosid rule', he told The Times.

However, he ruled out any chances of it containing the remains of Nefertiti, one of the most famous queens of the dynasty.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-11639559/Ancient-Egyptian-tomb-final-resting-place-QUEEN-princess-18th-Dynasty.html

>>18155831

>>18155748

Mario Nawfal

#TwitterFiles LIVE COVERAGE -PfizerFiles w/@lhfang

8:13 AM · Jan 16, 2023

https://mobile.twitter.com/MarioNawfal/status/1615019497022423042

https://twitter.com/i/spaces/1lDxLnNYvkkGm?s=20

>>18156184

7:30 AM · Jan 16, 2023

Lee Fang

@lhfang

1. New piece from the TWITTER FILES.

How the pharmaceutical industry lobbied social media to shape content around vaccine policy.

The push included direct pressure from Pfizer partner BioNTech to censor activists demanding low-cost generic vaccines for low-income countries.

1. In 2020, it was clear that the pandemic would require rapid innovation. Early on, there was a push to make the solution equitable: an international partnership to share ideas, technology, new forms of medicine to rapidly solve this crisis.

https://medicinespatentpool.org/news-publications-post/new-agreement-under-c-tap-aims-to-improve-global-access-to-covid-19-testing-technologies

1. But global drug giants saw the crisis as an opportunity for unprecedented profit. Behind closed doors, pharma launched a massive lobbying blitz to crush any effort to share patents/IP for new covid-related medicine, including therapeutics and vaccines.

1. BIO, the lobby group that represents biopharma, including Moderna & Pfizer, wrote to the newly elected Biden admin, demanding the U.S. gov sanction any country attempting to violate patent rights and create generic low cost covid medicine or vaccines.

https://theintercept.com/2021/03/03/vaccine-coronavirus-big-pharma-biden/

1. That brings us to Twitter. The global lobbying blitz includes direct pressure on social media. BioNTech, which developed Pfizer's vaccine, reached out to Twitter to request that Twitter directly censor users tweeting at them to ask for generic low cost vaccines.

1. Twitter's reps responded quickly to the pharma request, which was also backed by the German government. A lobbyist in Europe asked the content moderation team to monitor the accounts of Pfizer, AstraZeneca & of activist hashtags like #peoplesvaccine

1. The potential "fake accounts" that Twitter monitored for protesting Pfizer? These were real people. Here's one the Twitter team flagged for potential terms of use violations. I talked to Terry, a 74 year old retired bricklayer in the UK on the phone.

1. It's not clear what actions Twitter ultimately took on this particular request. Several Twitter employees noted in subsequent messages that none of this activism constituted abuse. But the company continued monitoring tweets.

1. In a separate push, Pfizer & Moderna's lobbying group, BIO, fully funded a special content moderation campaign designed by a contractor called Public Good Projects, which worked w/Twitter to set content moderation rules around covid "misinformation."

1. BIO provided $1,275,000 to the campaign, part of which is revealed through tax forms. The PGP campaign, called "Stronger," helped Twitter create content moderation bots, select which public health accounts got verification, helped crowdsource content takedowns.

1. Many of the tweets the BIO-funded campaign focused on were truly unhinged misinfo, like claims that vaccines include microchips. But others Stronger lobbied Twitter on were more of a grey area, like vaccine passports & vaccine mandates, policies that coerce vaccination.

1. The Moderna/Pfizer-funded campaign included direct regular emails with lists of tweets to takedown & others to verify. Here's an example of those types of emails that went straight to Twitter's lobbyists and content moderators. Many focused on @zerohedge, which was suspended.

1. Notably, this massive push to censor and label covid misinfo never applied to drug companies. When big pharma wildly exaggerated the risks of creating low-cost generic covid vaccines, Stronger did nothing. The rules applied only to critics of industry.

1. Here is my reported piece w/more detail. I was given some access to Twitter emails. I signed/agreed to nothing, Twitter had no input into anything I did or wrote. The searches were carried out by a Twitter attorney, so what I saw could be limited.

https://theintercept.com/2023/01/16/twitter-covid-vaccine-pharma/

https://twitter.com/lhfang/status/1615008625575202818