il Donaldo Trumpo
@PapiTrumpo
THEY'RE TURNING ON HIM!!!😂😂😂
Embedded video
1:55
194.6K views
12:48 PM · Jan 15, 2023
·
399.1K
https://twitter.com/PapiTrumpo/status/1614680819565576193
Tapper for the first time saysJoe Bidan lied. They’ve got their marching orders from the shadow president
il Donaldo Trumpo
@PapiTrumpo
SAVAGE TUCKER IS BACK!!!😂😂😂
Embedded video
0:37
51.4K views
4:00 PM · Jan 13, 2023
·
86.1K
https://twitter.com/PapiTrumpo/status/1614004356629626880
Is Trudeau drugging people to get more aggressive. Canadians used to be polite.
https://twitter.com/PrisonPlanet/status/1615310750167465985?s=20&t=NlFPdI5BMM2x2PQOkq1vqw
Meanwhile his SS will shoot to kill for this retard
https://twitter.com/catturd2/status/1615109405430943745?s=20&t=NlFPdI5BMM2x2PQOkq1vqw
The best thing about “them” taking down bidan,Elon and Paul Sperry are taking down Schitt
https://twitter.com/JeffClarkUS/status/1614318782469623812?s=20&t=NlFPdI5BMM2x2PQOkq1vqw
Capitol Police monitoring Paul Sperry’s tweets? Cut half the Capitol Police if they are used for this purpose
https://twitter.com/paulsperry_/status/1614682732784672768?s=20&t=NlFPdI5BMM2x2PQOkq1vqw
Is someone holding a gun to Garland’s head, telling him to pick the most corrupt for Special Counsel?
She seems like it, Garland cannot be that dumb.
https://mobile.twitter.com/JsnFostr/status/1613657143793655844?cxt=HHwWyIC90e2n7uQsAAAA
Along with anons that spread the word and trained the country on researching etc, there is an entire internet of MAGA Russiagate researchers, millions at this point, who look and find everything!
Excellent Job Anons!
Thats what Bannon and Boris said last night.
https://twitter.com/paulsperry_/status/1613617743281930241?s=20&t=NlFPdI5BMM2x2PQOkq1vqw
Journalist Paul Sperry Has More to Say, as Adam Schiff Starts Acting Nervous
Nick Arama2:15 PM on January 08, 2023
Journalist Paul Sperry is not going quietly into the night — as we reported, he’s been calling out the effort by Rep. Adam Schiff’s office to silence him, to get him suspended from Twitter as well as to shut down his reporting about things that Schiff didn’t want to be exposed.
In articles for RealClearInvestigations, I outed his anonymous “whistleblower” from the first impeachment of President Trump. It was Eric Ciaramella, a Democrat who had worked in the Trump White House as an Obama holdover. I also exposed Ciaramella’s prior relationship with one of Schiff’s top staffers on the impeachment committee, Sean Misko.
My reporting cast fresh doubts on Schiff’s claims that the 2019 impeachment process happened organically. The New York Times had already busted Schiff lying about prior contacts with the whistleblower. Initially, Schiff publicly stated his office never spoke with the whistleblower before he filed his complaint against President Trump, when in fact a Schiff staffer had huddled with him, something Schiff’s spokesman Patrick Boland was forced to admit after the Times broke the story. (The staffer was never identified.) The prior contacts led to suspicions Schiff’s office helped the whistleblower craft his complaint as part of a partisan operation.
In the censorship demands Schiff’s office sent Twitter, Misko and the “impeachment inquiry” are mentioned. It’s not clear if Ciaramella is, too, since some names are blacked out. Schiff demanded Twitter “remove any and all content”’ related to them.
Schiff told Twitter it was about shutting down “QAnon conspiracies” but as Sperry pointed out that wasn’t it at all.
In his list of demands, Schiff tried to justify banning me by claiming I was promoting “false QAnon conspiracies,” which I have never done and I challenge Schiff to produce evidence to back up his defamatory remarks.
Schiff knew better. He knew “QAnon” was a trigger for Twitter censors, who were suppressing QAnon posts.
This, even though it was Schiff who was spreading things like false Russia collusion information, Sperry said.
Sperry pointed out how Schiff’s office also tried to get his stories shut down by his chief of staff Patrick Boland calling his employer, RealClear Investigations with the ridiculous claim that they would “result in actual violence,” trying to use Jan. 6., when the stories exposed Schiff.
Months after Schiff lobbied Twitter to ban me and remove all the impeachment-related content from its platform, his communications director and chief of staff — Patrick Boland — tried to intimidate my editors at RCI into retracting the impeachment stories I broke a year earlier.
In his emails, Boland invoked “the events of January 6,” warning our stories could “result in actual violence” if they remained online. Over time, Boland’s demands became more and more strident. But my editors refused to give in to the bullying.
Sperry laid out Schiff for violating his oath and he asked the liberal media where they were on this whole matter when they seem to be missing in action when it comes to busting a prominent Democrat like Schiff.
Then Sperry laid out the timeline of events that led to his suspension and you can see how even though they initially said “no,” he was banned shortly after the Schiff people demanded it, and after they upped the game using Jan. 6 and potential “violence” as some sort of justification.
This is every danger to freedom of speech right there and this is how they were misusing Jan. 6 to shut down speech that exposed them. That alone is shameful, but as we see from what Schiff has done in the past, he has no shame.
Sperry has indicated that he is looking into what legal options he has regarding what happened and against Schiff.
As we noted, if he does that, he could get all kinds of things in discovery that could open up what Schiff’s office had been doing.
But Congress also should be taking action against Schiff for what he did and now that the Republicans have taken over, they can.
Schiff is about to lose his position on the House Intel Committee if House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (D-CA) follows through on his promise. So at least there will be that accountability — removing the position from where he launched so many lies. But they need to take formal action. And it sounds like Rep. Adam Schiff is not at all happy and is getting nervous about what might happen now.
https://redstate.com/nick-arama/2023/01/08/journalist-paul-sperry-has-more-to-say-as-adam-schiff-starts-acting-nervous-n685409
Bannon and Kash said last night that Goodlander is in charge of sending the personal attorneys to find all of bidan’s stolen documents, and is running this whole operation!
https://twitter.com/paulsperry_/status/1614326417751162880?s=20&t=28HLEGBqjUSZcdEK-KyaDg
Is there even one uncorrupt employee in this admin?
https://mobile.twitter.com/paulsperry_/status/1614323194357325825?cxt=HHwWgoC9hY2ZnecsAAAA
DC is a swamp filled with corruption, time to close it for good. There’s no way to start over again there.
https://twitter.com/paulsperry_/status/1614309838942609411?s=20&t=28HLEGBqjUSZcdEK-KyaDg
notable
Pages 2-6
21 pages total
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.txed.197917/gov.uscourts.txed.197917.92.0.pdf
Sometimes the comments are very informative
https://twitter.com/ProfMJCleveland/status/1615365582077009924?s=20&t=5STFVH1e0hA1BokOAcV-Wg
4 Absurd Media Narratives To Distract From Biden's Many Scandals
Margot Cleveland1 of 3
President Biden and his official representatives, whether members of his legal team or part of the White House’s press office, as well as his surrogates in the Democrat Party, find themselves drowning in scandal.
With House oversight committees now in the hands of Republicans, the Biden administration can no longer spurn demands for documents and answers to questions related to President Joe Biden’s involvement in and profiting from his son Hunter’s international financial entanglements. Add to that long-ignored scandal the incoming flood of questions concerning the discovery of three separate batches of unsecured classified documents dating back to his time as vice president, and we have a perfect storm set to destroy Biden’s presidency.
But Biden need not fret, as the legacy media have dispatched their journalists to moonlight as a PR team for the president, as best exemplified by The New York Times’ lengthy piece from last week, “Hunter Biden’s Tangled Tale Comes Front and Center.” The Times is not alone, however, in spinning the scandals. While it is still early days, here are four narratives that have already launched.
-
Republicans Pounce
No matter the scandal, the Democrat-defending media reflexively run with the “Republicans pounce” formula, and so the coverage of the investigations into Biden’s financial dealings and his mishandling of classified material predictably followed that approach. The story became about Republicans’ reaction to the scandal, not the scandal itself.
“Republicans pounced on the discovery on Saturday of more classified documents at Joe Biden’s residence, accusing the president of hypocrisy and questioning why the records were not brought to light earlier,” The Guardian opened its coverage of the revelation that Biden had stored classified documents at him home, in addition to in a closet at a D.C. office building.
Other outlets, such as CNN, moved away from the overused “Republicans pounce” framing, substituting “attack” for the overworn cliché: “As House Republicans officially take over Congress and clamor to investigate the Biden administration, a new line of attack fell squarely into their laps: classified documents recovered from one of President Joe Biden’s private offices when he served as vice president,” CNN began its coverage of the growing list of investigations Biden faces.
While the “pounced,” “attacked,” “seized,” and other thesaurus-ready descriptors of Republicans’ responses to the scandals permeate much of the corrupt media’s coverage of the Joe Biden scandals, The New York Times deserves accolades for creativity, with the Old Gray Lady making the story about Republicans in a fresh new way.
“The way Republicans tell it,” the Times opened, “President Biden has been complicit in a long-running scheme to profit from his position in public life through shady dealings around the world engineered by his son, Hunter Biden.” Then over the course of some 6,000 words, the Times presented the Biden family’s tale as its own.
While not the “Republican pounce” headline conservatives expect, this new introductory technique allows apologists in the press to divert attention away from the story by presenting the news as mere claims made by Republicans. The Times, however, quickly reverted to the pounced-light “attack” charge to soften the financial scandal, to wit:
After his father became vice president, Hunter Biden, a 52-year-old Yale-educated lawyer, forged business relationships with foreign interests that brought him millions of dollars, raised questions about whether he was cashing in on his family name, set off alarms among government officials about potential conflicts of interest, and provided Republicans an opening for years of attacks on his father…
https://thefederalist.com/2023/01/17/4-absurd-media-narratives-to-distract-americans-from-joe-bidens-simultaneous-scandals/
4 Absurd Media Narratives To Distract From Biden's Many Scandals
2 of 3
-
Poor Hunter
The New York Times’ nearly 6,000-word tome also introduced the prominent “poor Hunter” spin, hoping pity for the surviving Biden son would diminish the scandals — or at least sidetrack readers.
“And after the death of his brother, Beau, in 2015, Hunter descended into a spiral of addiction and tawdry and self-destructive behavior,” the Times told readers. Stressing Hunter is sober now, the supposed standard-bearer of journalism then framed his legal troubles as “stemming from his behavior during his most troubled years.” And as for Hunter lying on a form he filled out to purchase a handgun in 2018, falsely saying he was not using drugs, the Times sought to downplay any such charges by noting that Hunter “has openly acknowledged his years of struggle with drugs and alcohol…”
The potential gun charges and the tax evasion charges being looked into by the Delaware U.S. attorney’s office, the Times claimed “trace back” to a time when Hunter had “intensifying problems with addiction and his loss of relationships with three of the people closest to him: a longtime colleague, his wife and his brother.” The Times then spoke of Hunter’s business manager as his “safety net” who was in on the Biden family secret: Hunter’s alcoholism. But it was Beau, Hunter’s older brother, who ensured Hunter “attended Alcoholics Anonymous meetings and steered him back toward sobriety whenever he relapsed.”
“After Beau died of brain cancer in 2015,” the Times explained, “Hunter had another relapse and, for the first time, his brother was not there to help him. Hunter brought his drinking briefly back under control, but the first anniversary of Beau’s death sent him into a spiral of depression that led to an addiction to crack cocaine.”
On and on the New York Times went, adding details of Hunter’s failed marriage, his unsuccessful stints in rehab, and his toxic relationship with Beau’s widow. Then, once softened up by the sob story, the Times took to transcribing the Biden version of Hunter’s financial dealings and President Biden’s supposed lack of involvement in the pay-to-play scandals.
-
Orange Man Bad
One approach the corrupt media seems convinced will work to vindicate Joe Biden, though, is to focus on Donald Trump. The corporate press immediately resorted to this tactic to dampen the scandal swirling around Biden’s mishandling of classified documents from his time as Obama’s vice president.
Since news first broke that some 10 documents marked classified — including some marked top secret — had been discovered in a closet at a D.C. office building housing a think tank connected to Biden, the left-leaning press paraded for its audience all the ways Trump’s handling of classified documents was supposedly worse.
Biden immediately cooperated with the National Archives, his apologists stressed; Biden had only misplaced a fraction of the documents Trump had retained, the corporate media intoned. Of course, the media ignored Biden’s own condemnation of the mishandling of classified documents as “irresponsible,” because the bottom line for the press and other TV personalities is clear: That the 46th president mishandled classified documents doesn’t matter because Trump is a liar and a thief, and Biden isn’t.
The Orange Man Bad defense also made an appearance in the article the Times published to counter the evidence of corrupt business dealings by the Biden family. Seeking to make the overwhelming evidence of Biden family corruption about Trump, the Times claimed Trump had attempted “to muscle Ukraine into helping him sully the Bidens,” for which Trump was later impeached….
4 Absurd Media Narratives To Distract From Biden's Many Scandals
3 of 3
Legacy media outlets are likewise framing the forthcoming investigations of FBI malfeasance as about Donald Trump. “The new House Republican majority plans to create a special committee that could serve as a one-stop shop for investigating perceived wrongdoing by the federal government against conservatives, including former president Donald Trump,” NBC News opened its piecereporting on the establishment of a Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government. The network then quoted at length Democrats who framed the committee as nothing but a Trump “MAGA Grievance Subcommittee.”
From the early coverage, then, it appears Democrats and their paramours in the press plan to ignore the overwhelming evidence of FBI misconduct and peddle the Orange Man Bad narrative. But while Trump may be a polarizing figure, it is doubtful his glow will blind Americans to the many ways the FBI and other government agencies were weaponized, including against parents and scientists dissenting from the Covid party line.
-
Americans Want GOP to Solve Real Problems
A fourth narrative the complicit press is pushing to advantage their Democrat friends seeks to silence the scandals entirely by pretending that any investigation interferes with Congress’s ability to solve the serious problems facing our country.
Again, we see a legacy network, this time CBS News, providing this pro-Democrat spin by polling Americans on their preferred priorities for the upcoming Congress. “Inflation remains a concern, and Americans across the political spectrum want Congress to focus on it, amid the usual calls for bipartisanship from most of the nation,” CBS News said, pushing its poll of 2,144 Americans. The article then highlighted the “big bipartisan majorities” that “say Congress should address inflation, reduce crime, and protect Social Security and Medicare.”
In contrast, CBS News noted, “over half of today’s Republican identifiers also put a ‘high priority’ on the House investigating the president, and also his son, Hunter Biden — especially those who define themselves as part of the MAGA movement.” “Most Americans, and most non-MAGA Republicans, do not agree,” CBS News stressed, gifting Democrats the “Americans want Congress to focus on the real issues facing the country and not Hunter Biden” talking point.
But it is not an either-or proposition: Republicans and the House can address inflation and corruption at the same time. And the focus of the House Oversight Committee is just that: oversight. Likewise, the new subcommittee’s focus on the weaponization of the FBI and the rest of the bureau’s friends in the federal government takes nothing away from Republicans attempting to address serious problems our country faces.
Nonetheless, the corrupt media will likely push the narrative that any Republican investigation distracts from addressing the country’s real problems. But as disingenuous as it is, at least that narrative acknowledges the reality of the mess America is in thanks to the Biden administration.
The programming was deep, many said they took it to stop the harassment others said they wanted to travel
17 Jan, 2023 14:19
Russia’s top spy explains why Ukrainian crisis remains deadlocked
Kiev’s Western “masters” are to blame, Sergey Naryshkin says
Kiev is unable to engage in peace talks with Moscow because the US and its allies forbid it from doing so, Russian spy chief Sergey Naryshkin has said.
“The overseas masters of the Ukrainian regime won’t allow getting [the Ukrainian] dossier off the ground,” Naryshkin told Tass on Tuesday.
He brought up the negotiations that took place between Russia and Ukraine in Istanbul in late March, when “certain basic agreements were reached.”
“However, those in Washington, those in London, told their associates in Kiev: ‘No, [there should be] no peace talks, no peace. We’ve already paid you several dozen billion. We’ve invested in you; we’ll continue to pump money and weapons, and your task is simple – go and fight’,” Naryshkin insisted.
The Ukrainian government then quickly backtracked on all the promises it had made in Istanbul, with the sudden change of mood occurring shortly after then-UK prime minister Boris Johnson visited Kiev.
Russia and Ukraine haven’t sat behind the negotiating table since then, with Ukrainian President Vladimir Zelensky even signing a decree that officially banned him from talking to his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin.
Zelensky is now promoting a UN-hosted international summit planned to be held in New York on February 24 – the anniversary of the launch of the Russian military operation in Ukraine. The event, in which the settlement of the conflict is going to be discussed without Moscow, is expected to focus on the 10-point “peace plan” previously outlined by Kiev, which, among other things, calls for Russia to withdraw to borders claimed by Ukraine, pay reparations and submit to war crimes tribunals.
Moscow has rejected Zelensky’s proposal, saying that it refuses to account for the reality on the ground and actually shows Kiev’s unwillingness to find a solution to the crisis. However, Putin and other Russian officials have repeatedly stated that Moscow is prepared to engage in dialogue, but on its own terms, one of which is Ukraine recognizing the status of Donetsk, Lugansk, Kherson, and Zaporozhye as parts of Russia.
Earlier this week, the head of the Russian Foreign Ministry’s Second CIS (Commonwealth of Independent States) Department, Aleksey Polishchuk, pointed out that if negotiation between the sides eventually take place, they’ll likely talk to each other directly as “Western mediators often pursue their own goals and try to influence the course of negotiations … in their own political and economic interests.”
https://www.rt.com/russia/570012-ukraine-us-uk-naryshkin/
17 Jan, 2023 12:10
New meeting with CIA’s Burns ‘possible’ – Russian spy chief
Heads of the two intelligence services previously held talks in mid-November
Sergey Naryshkin, who heads Russia’s Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR), has said he is willing to have a face-to-face with his counterpart from the CIA, Director William Burns. The two previously held a meeting in Ankara in mid-November.
Russia's top spy said on Tuesday that a new engagement with Burns was “possible,” the news agency TASS reported.
Türkiye’s National Intelligence Organization hosted the previous meeting between the two in November last year, which reportedly lasted for about two and a half hours. The senior officials discussed nuclear threats arising from the Ukraine conflict and ways to mitigate them, according to the American side. Then, Burns reportedly traveled to Kiev to meet Ukrainian President Vladimir Zelensky.
Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov lamented last month that the event in Türkiye was made public, blaming a leak in Washington.
“The Americans themselves told us ten times that this channel of communication was absolutely confidential and should not be disclosed … so that it would not be tainted by some propagandistic spin,” he told journalists.
“We agreed.But as soon as they landed in Ankara, [the news] got immediately leaked. I don’t know where from, whether it was the White House or the Department of State,” he added.
In his interview with TASS on Tuesday, Naryshkin discussed the Ukraine crisis, and Russia’s cooperation with China and Iran
https://www.rt.com/russia/570002-naryshkin-burns-meeting-possible/
I think they go tranny because they know their ugliness will turn off men and only other ugly women will accept them