Horowitz needs to be asked:
What do you consider the final version of your (OIG) report?
Do you consider the final report what was released (after editing by your superiors) or is the final report your unblemished report prior to editing and redactions?
I watched yesterday and I kept seeing the disconnect by the Senators who read the report and the statement about 'no political bias' in the report.
It occurred to me that Horowitz could be technically telling the truth if he were referring to the edited/redacted version as the 'final report'.
Frankly, I assume the Repubs know this too.
Will anyone dare ask the operative question rather than gaining political points for grandstanding?
These folks are disgusting.
Horowitz reminds me of Bourdain sans heroin
Viv(a) Alex Jones!!!!!!!