>>1815986 (LB)
rt >>1815450 (LB)
Didn't get posted in last bread before it ran out. Here are some screen grabs from back then, this was Saturday Dec 30th (the Dig).
The last pic is from a testimony about Moore, where I believe she is wearing the same ring as in the testimony where the Getty image was Shooped.
One thing about this woman, is she loves her jewelry. Samples of different rings.
TY anons.
Just don't be so quick to call shill on everyone. Couple of real pricks in the last bread.
>Then let's keep asking, why is Getty Images photoshopping a pedo ring?
EXACTLY!
And, when else have they done it?
I came to the conclusion this was done to compromise her.
Later, she got a payout.
She was Chairwoman of major committee (need to look, Homeland?). Perfect person to blackmail.
ID 1522d0
Seriously? Those are screen-grabs from the original c-span footage.
Go dig on the video at cspan in the link provided, and sauce it yourself you faggot.
>>1816468 KEK.
The actual ring she wore in the testimony may not be the one in the blue-dress Moore pic.
My only point is that she wasn't wearing the pedo ring at the orig 2009 testimony, and the GETTY image is a FAKE.
The rest of the story on who and why we can all dig on.
>https://www.c-span.org/video/?290735-1/release-transportation-security-agency-information
Ok, I'm seeing what you are anon, and trying to reconcile. Just looked at that video.
Are the spirals running in opposite directions? Looks like it. There is some fuckery here, maybe not though.
>>1816671 Only thing I noticed is the spirals looked like they are going in opposite directions.
That was something quirky about the first Getty dig, is the spirals there are opposite the actual symbol. As if, while Shooping the image, it was easier to reverse it and get it to line up.
Ok, have to go now, and can't dig in files any longer.
I actually archived the video clips back then using the cspan clip function.
Whatever - I have no position one way or another, just that we see the truth anons.
What is is.