Anonymous ID: 6fe6ba Jan. 17, 2023, 11:10 a.m. No.18162496   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>18162344 (lb)

Ad hominem.

 

>>18162399 (lb)

>Didn't read the tread

He disputes the data provided and provided examples of where errors were made that were not only pertinent to the analysis, but he was actually shocked that a fellow MD could make such an error. Point out where the rebuttable (in that thread) makes an analytical mistake.

 

>>18162410 (lb)

>we actually source shit

So did I.

Do you want to be persuaded, or do you want actual data to be shown in order for you to make up your own mind?

Anonymous ID: 6fe6ba Jan. 17, 2023, 12:14 p.m. No.18162904   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>18162810

>Attendees going to get their fresh blackmail videos taken?

Not necessarily. Many are just soliciting services that are legal there (especially if the ones providing the services are locals that regularly work). It's a heavily regulated/controlled business in the countries in Europe that allow it, and coincidentally those places have extremely low rates of sexual assaults (I wonder why?).

 

Epstein type stuff? Yeah, that's more along the lines of what you are thinking. This type of thing? Meh, maybe, maybe not. Not saying it isn't happening, but to finger rates of solicited services of sex workers, and the prices for those services both going up, is just showing you how that market adapts to tourism. Not defending, just trying to be objective.

 

I think anons might find it more interesting how sex workers in other EU countries take advantage of these types of gatherings – to get "temporary permits" to work in other EU countries when events like these are happening. That's where you'll likely find the most shady activities/trafficking.