>>181723

Physics has a few things to say about the legitimacy of that story….

Electrically powered… shoots ice… - using…? Electro-magical-acceleration?

Ice is a poor penetrator. It has a low mass and is a very rigid crystalline structure - it tends to shatter rather than penetrate. The small size claimed would give the 'gun' a very limited range, possibly even less than a few inches.

At this range, you may as well use a typical "air needle" injection system, which has been around for some time.

But when gunshot wounds to the back of the head with no powder residue are labeled suicides in this country… who needs secret crime weapons?

>>181839

The post I was replying to most certainly said it shot a small bullet of ice using a shellfish toxin to trigger a heart attack.

Now it uses microwaves to muck with my heart?

Again, if only physics were so convenient. The problem with such a strategy is that water (the primary component of our bodies) tends to absorb microwave and RF quite well.

If it didn't - it would be simple to configure something like a radar to kill people by the thousands on the battlefield. Us avionics fags could just make a few FPGA edits and we suddenly have a death ray that paints the world in heart attacks.

This being the case, it should seem highly unnecessary for the global elite to go through much of a media manipulation plan. Trump should be easy enough to kill with this thing from a distance (unless a tinfoil-lined jacket is all it takes to stump this thing), and it would look like he just had a heart attack in the middle of a speech.

Not ruling out, entirely, the idea that electromagnetic systems couldn't muck with the heart's control signals - but it would be impractical to use 'in the wild' - outside of specific laboratory setups that take advantage of an engineered environment/room.

>>181973

In theory, that would be up for them to decide as their sovereignty is restored. In practice, Russia is probably going to become a bit of an unusual ally to a re-founded Western Europe and will be crucial in routing the CIA's army of Aloha-Snackbars.

The U.S, too - but it, honestly, makes more sense to let Russia and Europe go back to their more historic relationship prior to the social engineering project of Socialism that brain-fucked the whole world into absurdity. They occasionally squabbled, usually when the Germanic tribes decided it would be a fun idea to try and go annex tundra in the dead of winter - but neither of them really wanted Bosnia in their back yards.

But that is, ultimately, the thing about freedom… it means you face a bit of uncertainty in your decisions. There aren't designated safe ones. You just have to be confident that your friends and abilities will be sufficient to recover from errors, oversights, and blind-sides. People often over-estimate risk and under-estimate their abilities.