>>18167821

>>18168207

Yeah, except socialism actually worked just fine in Sweden until they started with the mass importations. People can behave like an ant colony. Not that they should (because someone always ends up being corrupted by power and taking rights away from others), but that they are capable of it. A homogeneous society with the same diets, similar routines, and generally healthy disposition can live in a "socialist" state because universal health care and other social services will balance out. But yeah, the moment you start tossing a bunch of people that don't agree/contribute, it fails.

But we don't talk about that because it's unrealistic, A, and B, is something that could never work in the USA because our system is way superior, regardless.

>>18168220

I agree!

>>18168247

It's a mixed bag. I know some that homeschooled because of issues that many anons would probably say were caused by early/frequent vaccination. So it's certainly not a "1 to 1" thing. But I have known some homeschoolers that excelled, yes, and it would be interesting to see what their vaccine schedule, from birth to young adulthood, looked like. I also like to look at how heavily indoctrinated in a church the homeschooled types were, too, because that is almost a "1 to 1" in the homeschooling community as far as the rural types go.

I'd say that of all the homeschoolers I knew growing up, 2 of the 10 turned out well off, 4 are supporting themselves (or married someone to support them) pretty well, and the rest went absolutely ape shit as teens (a couple with some brief run ins with law). No nuclear scientists or theoretical physicists to mention. Not saying it doesn't happen, but when you consider all the ones I mentioned were from lower/mid middle class homes and very religious, there was probably more at play there then the utter lack of socialization and vaccines.

The most successful homeschooled types that I've observed are the ones from already successful families, and more often than not, learning to take over family business, or were fortunate enough to have truly engaging parents challenging their kid to explore their talents to the fullest, and finally, not stuck up a church's ass 7 days a week and keeping their kid from socializing from anyone outside of that circle.

>>18168412

>My hypothesis is that vaccines directly impact IQ and EQ as well.

Sure thing.

>There is such an effort to extinguish the "control group" of totally unvaccinated.

Seems to me the purpose of the COVID response (psyop) was to raise this very question, and get people fighting back.

>It is my belief that if you had two matched groups of children and one group was vaccinated according to the CDC "schedule" and the other was totally unvaccinated you would see that all sorts of mental and emotional problems would be vastly less in the unvaccinated.

Not sure this would ever be possible due to needing to take into consideration so many potentially affecting variables (social interactions, abusive/non-abusive environments, possible inherited disorders, etc.). Something to ponder for certain, though.

>I think homeschoolers are probably less vaccinated than public school attendees.

Again, it's a mixed bag for me. Everyone but 1 in the list of people that I mentioned to you had all the "regular, at birth" vaccines. The 1 that didn't? He was one of the couple that had run ins with the law, and was brought up in a very strict church environment.

Lotsa factors, ya know?