tyb
I think you have a mislabel notable
>>18169692 (You) Big lawsuit coming today from America First Legal. Stay tuned.
you can add >>18169692 to the Macias Lafayette notable if you want. part of that
>Wonder what this contract is for? That's a lot of fukn money
https://govtribe.com/award/federal-idv-award/indefinite-delivery-contract-n6600115d0028
Federal Contract Awards
Federal Contract Awards for Federal Contract IDV N6600115D0028
‹
Name
Awardee
Potential Value
(Click to sort descending)
Award Date
(Click to sort descending)
Completion Date
(Click to sort descending)
Updated At
(Click to sort ascending)
N6600115D0028-N6600120F0433
Logo for null
Lafayette Group, Inc.
$9.2m
pandemic election timeframe
3/21/20
5/30/21
4/15/21
PUBLIC SAFETY STRATEGIC COMMUNICATIONS AND INTEROPERABLE COMMUNICATIONS TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE'
N6600115D0028-N6600119F0411
Logo for null
Lafayette Group, Inc.
$4.8m
3/26/19
3/25/21
9/21/20
ELECTIONS INFRASTRUCTURECYBERSECURITY PLANNING AND GOVERNANCE
N6600115D0028-N6600118F1001
Logo for null
Lafayette Group, Inc.
$15.1m
9/25/18
9/25/20
6/25/20
ENGINEERING SERVICES
N6600115D0028-N6600118F1463
Logo for null
Lafayette Group, Inc.
$4.6m
8/20/18
8/19/20
6/24/20
NATIONAL EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS PLAN
N6600115D0028-0004
Logo for null
Lafayette Group, Inc.
$19.9m
3/1/17
10/31/20
5/27/20
FIRSTNET - CCO SUPPORT
>Lafayette Group, Inc.
>
>$19.9m
>
~39 days into Trump Presidency
>3/1/17
>
3 days before election
>10/31/20
>
>5/27/20
>FIRSTNET - CCO SUPPORT
What was the reason they gave for not giving up the splunk logs for Maricopa Audit?
First hit when search firstnet
Built by AT&T
Power of FirstNet
The first nationwide network dedicated to public safety is ready to help law enforcement, fire service, and EMS do their jobs safely and effectively.
>>FIRSTNET - CCO SUPPORT
>What was the reason they gave for not giving up the splunk logs for Maricopa Audit?
>First hit when search firstnet
>Built by AT&T
For public safety, by public safety
Due to communications challenges during the response to the 9/11 terrorist attacks, the 9/11 Commission recommended the establishment of a single, interoperable network for public safety. For years, public safety organizations lobbied Congress to make this recommendation a reality. Therefore, when Congress established the First Responder Network Authority (FirstNet) in 2012, it based its mission on public safety’s express concerns and desires.
To truly design the FirstNet network for public safety by public safety – a distinction that makes it unique in American telecommunications history – FirstNet continuously consults with local, state/territory, tribal and federal public safety agencies across the country.
Over the past several years, FirstNet has collaborated with public safety stakeholders and leadership from each state and territory. Never before has the public safety community had the opportunity to provide input towards the creation of a nationwide broadband network tailored specifically to meet their needs as they save lives and protect communities across the nation.
>What was the reason they gave for not giving up the splunk logs for Maricopa Audit?
suppose the routers were connected to a nationwide broadband first responder network. supported by Lafayette Group
As Senate Audit Gets Closer To Maricopa County’s Routers, Questions Remain About Penzone’s Concerns
October 23, 2021 Terri Jo Neff
computer chip
In May, Maricopa County Sheriff Paul Penzone said requests by the Arizona Senate’s audit team to review routers used by the county’s election department would “jeopardize the entire mission of the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office,”although he did not provide a more detailed explanation.
The sheriff’s concerns were shared at the time by Maricopa County Attorney Alister Adel, who advised the county’s board of supervisors to deny access to the subpoenaed routers. Adel insisted that if “criminal elements” gained access to the router data “it might compromise county and federal law enforcement efforts and put the lives of law enforcement personnel at risk.”
Last month the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors agreed in principle to pay the cost for former U.S. Rep. John Shadegg to act as intermediaries to ask the Senate’s questions about the routers and Splunk logs showing internet activities. Shadegg’s services contract was finally released earlier this week showing the county will pay $500 an hour for his services plus an undetermined amount for up to three IT assistants.
It is hoped that information about the county’s routers will start to become available for the Senate in a few weeks.