Anonymous ID: b3f74d Jan. 19, 2023, 12:58 p.m. No.18176134   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>6153 >>6181

>>18176045

>>18176076

>Crowder never said anything of the sort.

Agree.

Crowder did not like the way contracts are set up - wants a new model, thinks the old type of contracts are a trap. That's a legit concern. He envisions a different approach which he outlined in brief. He did mention names, either, just talked about what he didn't like.

Anonymous ID: b3f74d Jan. 19, 2023, 1:04 p.m. No.18176186   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>18176114

>terrible contract

in modern times, lawyers habitually make contracts like this - with cut-throat provisions that benefit their clients. That has to change, can't build a decent society based on those values.

 

>What may be missed in some of the back and forth… is that even if Utube hates his content… Tube is still making massive profit OFF of Crowder’s popularity.

How much does YT make off of tons of other de-monetized conservative content providers (the ones they haven't kicked off yet?)