The meme proves the guy exists.
I understand you believe Boering's description of Crowder's response was false.
I happen to agree with Boering after watching both Crowder's video and Boering's videos in full.
Yes, Youtube may very well be seeking to 'compel' certain content, but what you're leaving out of the equation, which is actually the most crucial part of it, THAT'S NOT DW's FAULT, they're offering Crowder $50 to $100 million and they expect Crowder to say whatever he needs to say to drive revenues.
Crowder falsely characterized Boering's company as if they're colluding with big tech, when they're censored and shadowbanned themselves and are only making good business decision to mitigate possible risks of ad and subscription revenue hits.
It's a bitch yes, it sucks that big tech can wield such authority, but you can't expect Boering to run a conservative company that is itself shadowbanned by big tech, offer a talent $50 to $100 million, and then expect to keep paying that regardless of what Youtube does.
If Boering DIDN'T do that, he'd be in a dereliction of his duty as a fiduciary to maximize the value of the DW as a company.
I believe that because humanity is ENSLAVED by the Satanic Rothschild cult 'central bank' monetary system cartel, that the power of money itself has become severed from pure value creation, and inexplicably intertwined with 'narrative'.
Look at how hard Trump had to fight just to have a voice on social media. He had to create a social media platform himself, and he's even more influential than Crowder.
This 'exposure of the Republican media establishment' is in my view an exposure of a rotten monetary system in general.
When a communist satanic cult controls money itself, for decade after decade, for 100 years, it makes total sense that even the best of people find that in order to even survive as a business, they succumb to the reality of economic pressures.
This is IMO by design, which Q wrote about.
I think the answer to your question is what has been happening: Exposure of the 'puppet masters'.
>“If Boering DIDN'T do that, he'd be in a dereliction of his duty as a fiduciary to maximize the value of the DW as a company.”. Have you spent too much time swimming in the poowater of mathmagical accounting????
Happily very little, which is precisely why I know where Boering is coming from.
Crowder should not have trashed Boering like he did, he totally mischaracterized Boering's motivation as CEO of a company, a conservative company, trying to grow in an environment where big tech is 99% anti-conservative.
Imagine yourself paying an employee $50 million freaking dollars, and then say to your shareholders,
Hey everyone, we're going to pay that guy $50 million, and even if our revenues collapse, even if it's because of a reaction by big tech to what he said, we'll still pay him $50 million because I'm a stupid fucking idiot who doesn't care about the time, money and effort you all are putting in this company."