Anonymous ID: a811ca Jan. 20, 2023, 5:58 a.m. No.18180508   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0512

>>18180385

Such an interesting turn of events. One could argue Crowder certainly had "bad form" in how he wanted to address the issue of Big Conservative Conglomerates coordinating with Big Tech to put out Big Voices to influence and steer the conversation. But how else would you even broach the conversation, that in the age where Old Guard media is being discredited and dismantled, and alt-media has been exposed for the influence grift game that it is, that independent influencers are being asked to get into deals that essentially involve a direct conflict of their interests in (ultimately) doing the bidding of Big Tech?

 

The fact that Daily Wire voices have responded the way they have shows a lot. ALSO, didn't most of these people recently come out against PDJT after the midterms?

 

Read that last sentence again.

 

>>18180440

>Conservatives need to be more discerning when told something by a popular personality

Oh, no kidding. Most people are full of shit regardless of political affiliation. Conservatives are just as guilty of "Fit into this mold, otherwise you are toxic and literally destroying the Republic" as liberals are. Of course, it's not just limited to conservatives and liberals, but I digress.

 

Love ya, Kari!

Anonymous ID: a811ca Jan. 20, 2023, 6:12 a.m. No.18180551   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0573

Scott has his marching orders. "Defend itself", Scott? Isn't that the point of journalism? If Project Veritas did an expose of how Daily Wire is obeying the whims of Big Tech by curbing views with ad revenue restrictions, it would be celebrated. Crowder does it, and suddenly the conservative movement is exposed as being just another prop of narratives meant to steer people's thinking.

 

How many tapes of "perfect phone calls" do we have of PDJT? Looks to me Crowder took some notes from the greatest president we ever had.

 

https://twitter.com/ScottAdamsSays/status/1616429401721438208

Never work with a person who records your calls and plays them in public. Wow.

 

The DW's first offer was a reasonable starting place. Crowder could have countered on points that mattered to him but asked the other side to "negotiate with itself," in effect. Bad form.

Anonymous ID: a811ca Jan. 20, 2023, 6:29 a.m. No.18180634   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0639 >>0642

There are lots of people Big Made over this Big Exposure of Big Con and Big Tech.

 

https://twitter.com/johncardillo/status/1616311319384461313

Honestly, I’m still blown away by the number they offered Crowder.

 

I don’t know one person who watches the guy, and I’ve never once heard his name mentioned as an inside influencer in political circles.

 

Does he actually move any needles?

Anonymous ID: a811ca Jan. 20, 2023, 6:32 a.m. No.18180645   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0665 >>0677

>>18180573

I've never followed any of the influencers, and I often disagree with many conservatives because they take things to such an extreme that their scripts are overly obvious. But I followed Crowder today because he's done pissed off all the right people that set off my "bullshit detector" on a daily fucking basis.