One is revealing lawful SCOTUS decisions ahead of time, the other was revealing illegality of government / agency actions - not the same.
Quite true anon, but not in the way ghey-eye has been spammed across the board for the last few days, where they ask a question (in a certain way) and then take the answer given as gospel. And you'd need to implicitly trust whomever set up the tool in the case of "ghey-eye".
Except when it isn't, kek.
>qresear.ch
I may have misunderstood you anon, but qresear.ch isn't 'here' it's a searchable archive of here…a separate website.
I'm tired anon, I did wonder if /s but erred on the side of caution. It does have it's place, but how it's being used here isn't helpful. And the companies that have provided the engines thus far, anon does not trust - there is ample evidence of bias. Machine learning and the "A..I.." (and isn't true a.i.. in the sense of Turing tests) can be excellent tools when harnessed correctly - anon doesn't think that is something that can be achieved here with our resources, and the amount of crap here would polute the data.
*pollute