Anonymous ID: 055303 Jan. 20, 2023, 7:30 a.m. No.18180913   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0920 >>1029 >>1225 >>1255

They're so desperate over getting called out for getting triggered over a sword meme that they muhjoo while claiming to not muhjoo.

 

It's like playing chess with pigeons. They shit all over the board, then fly away.

Anonymous ID: 055303 Jan. 20, 2023, 7:34 a.m. No.18180929   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0935 >>0945 >>0963

>>18180920

They really do take the bait every time, then project and accuse you of taking the bait that they themselves just took.

They're here 24/7 and make sure to let you know how they know you're here 24/7, and they really do have an agenda to smear and slander morning prayers, while falsely slandering Anons posting as Anons as being 'namefaggots' despite never posting with any names.

 

Total failure.

Anonymous ID: 055303 Jan. 20, 2023, 8:25 a.m. No.18181192   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1215 >>1242

Re: Crowder / Daily Wire

 

Cates is totally wrong here.

 

He writes:

"He should be allowed to say what he wants and if the blue-haired woke platform staff takes his video down for offending them, why should HE be penalized monetarily for being censored?"

 

What Cates is missing:

WHY SHOULD DW CONTINUE TO PAY CROWDER IF CROWDER'S ACTIONS, WHATEVER THEY ARE, BRING ABOUT A COLLAPSE IN AD/SUBSCRIPTION REVENUES TO DW? WHY SHOULD DW EXCLUSIVELY ASSUME THIS RISK WHEN THEY'RE PAYING HIM $MILLIONS?

 

That is the question Cates is missing. Why CAN'T this business partnership have a SHARED BURDEN from potential 'big tech censorship' which will result in a decline in revenues TO DW?

 

Cates totally misrepresents what Boering said here:

"DW answered by simply saying "JUST DON'T SAY ANYTHING THAT WOULD EARN YOU A STRIKE IN THE FIRST PLACE!"

 

Boreing NEVER SAID THAT, and even IF he did, THERE WOULD BE NOTHING WRONG WITH PROTECTING THEIR EIGHT FUCKING FIGURE SALARY OFFER TO CROWDER.

 

If Youtube censors Crowder, because of what Crowder said, right or wrong, WHY SHOULD DW BE THE EXCLUSIVE LOSER HERE? WHY SHOULD THEIR INVESTMENT TAKE A HIT AND NOT CROWDER'S SALARY?

 

DW is a BUSINESS. Cates seems to believe DW is a fucking charity, a benefactor source of GUARANTEED MULTI MILLION INCOME even if DW's revenues collapse?

 

"And I don't think Crowder could accept that."

 

He doesn't have to 'accept' it, that's why it was an offer sheet. DW is in the business to make money, Cates seems to be completely ignoring on the reality of what it takes to run a business.

 

https://truthsocial.com/@BrianCates/posts/109722324836581965

Anonymous ID: 055303 Jan. 20, 2023, 8:41 a.m. No.18181297   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1398

>>18181232

You claimed they NEVER got shadowbanned.

So I take it you actually believe Twitter did not shadowban or suppress any of the dozens and dozens of Hunter Laptop stories prior to the election?

 

How can you claim to know they "never" did, despite the Twitter files proving the STORY was censored?