Anonymous ID: d5e634 Jan. 20, 2023, 7:21 a.m. No.18180876   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>0891 >>0932 >>0938

>>18180841

 

Crowder has had Mug Club for quite a few years now…

 

Membership allows people to choose where their money goes.

 

Not bundled into a TV/Phone/Internet package where nobody ever watches 3/4 of the channels anyway.

 

The alternative way to make money IS to let people choose where their money goes.

 

If a site makes enough money on membership to stay afloat, without ad revenue, that's already a win.

 

DIRECT SALES… No Middle Man bullshit that is allowed to dictate what you can/can't do with your content.

 

If those people doing memberships also have ad sponsors… okay great, but the business model should center on growth based on membership. Merchandise, awesome! Collaboration, awesome!

 

I don't know how many members Crowder has for Mug Club, but enough people choose to pay for it. That's where the model centers.

 

People are tired of hearing glazed over bullshit… "oh we can't say this because youtube"

 

I guarantee there are enough people sick and tired of Big Tech that they would gladly pay for the content they -REALLY- want…

 

And in all honesty…. $10 a month, that's a Coffee with some change (maybe)…

 

The key is finding enough people willing to risk it all to adopt this business model and not be silenced.

Anonymous ID: d5e634 Jan. 20, 2023, 7:36 a.m. No.18180939   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>18180924

 

So glad that so many others see the same thing…

 

Going to repost to this bread for continued conversation

 

>>18180799 (me LB)

 

Alliances with real conservative companies that what… rely on Ad Revenue..

 

I know more than enough about business to know two things…

 

  1. Why the system has been maintained for so long (Because advertisers rule the fucking game)

 

  1. Because there has been nobody BRAVE enough to be willing to risk it all on a business model that DOES NOT require dependency on a system controlled by others.

 

This is the division that has always existed fren… You either play by the game… or you get steam rolled by those that do.

 

"Real Conservative Companies"

 

Let's digest this label.

 

If they are -still- censoring themselves because they RELY ON ADVERTISING revenue… then are they -really- fighting the system?

 

If the "Real Conservative Companies" Are playing the game big tech wants them to play… Then you may as well have an alliance with Big Tech.

 

There isn't anything complex about that contract… and I have negotiated -numerous- contracts in my lifetime with multi million dollar companies.

 

It's the rejection of a Business Model that is so heavily reliant on ADVERTISING REVENUE…. Which is literally the existence of Mainstream Media in a nice neat little package with a label on it.

 

Honestly I'm glad it went public… Because that is THE ONLY way this horrible business model is going to EVER END… Is with people willing to RISK IT ALL to make a stand and say NO

 

I have watched the Ad Revenue modelDESTROYmainstream media, and society as a whole… over the course of my lifetime.

 

And one thing is for damn sure…

 

Not. A. Fucking. Thing. Will. Change…

 

Unless someone MAKES THE CHANGE

Anonymous ID: d5e634 Jan. 20, 2023, 7:49 a.m. No.18181010   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>18180992

 

Sure he's definitely serving a hidden agenda…

 

The hidden agenda is and has always been to expose those in this movement that actually seek to undermine.

 

Everyone has a hidden agenda, that doesn't immediately make them nefarious… whatever the Agenda… is what makes it nefarious.

 

Exposing entrenched Old Guard collaborators is an Agenda worth hiding until the time is right.

 

And of course… Timing is everything.

 

Lets not forget Crowder's first shots were fired on 1.17

 

o7

Anonymous ID: d5e634 Jan. 20, 2023, 7:58 a.m. No.18181062   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>1069 >>1080 >>1107 >>1242 >>1257 >>1387

>>18181045

 

It was never even about the money… If you don't see that, then you clearly haven't paid attention.

 

Just because DW said he was complaining about money… doesn't mean it's true… In fact it was bullshit.

 

Stick around and enjoy the show.

 

It's not about the money, he even said so.

 

>Nothing motivates Shapiro more than money.

 

There, I fixed your sentence for you.

 

kek

Anonymous ID: d5e634 Jan. 20, 2023, 8:03 a.m. No.18181083   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>1209

>>18181065

 

I think that's where our disagreement is… You do not believe it should have been publicly aired.

 

I do. Because it shines light on a continuing control mechanism that still bows to big tech, and maintaining the status quo.

 

Time will tell, and this story is far from over.

Anonymous ID: d5e634 Jan. 20, 2023, 8:10 a.m. No.18181116   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>1126

>>18181104

 

Time will tell.

 

I see his intentions as the only way forward…

 

If the Ad Revenue business model IS NOT CHALLENGED…

 

Then censorship will always be controlled by the people paying the Ad Money…

 

THIS is the fight… and quite honestly… It's worth fighting for, regardless of who leads the fight.

 

A business model that does not rely on advertising is the only way forward in media. otherwise nothing will ever change.

Anonymous ID: d5e634 Jan. 20, 2023, 8:34 a.m. No.18181247   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>1270

>>18181234

 

It's much more than that.

 

It's about rejecting a business model that bows to big tech censorship by being reliant on Ad Revenue.

 

No problem fren.

 

I just provide the sauce… It's up to you to make the decision for yourself.

 

o7

Anonymous ID: d5e634 Jan. 20, 2023, 8:38 a.m. No.18181273   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>1287 >>1288 >>1301 >>1304

>>18181242

 

OH… don't forget the part about seeing them aswage slavesfor a little while… so they can build their brand.

 

This is bigger than Crowder… He's just holding up the mirror and suffering the slings and arrows of thousands that don't want the status quo to change.

 

To The Future

 

Now if there was only someone that was capable of doing the same thing in the Gaming Industry to stand up to all the woke bullshit that's plagued it also… But it's practically been rolled into Big Tech at this point.

 

o7

Anonymous ID: d5e634 Jan. 20, 2023, 8:43 a.m. No.18181303   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>1313

>>18181287

 

Most recent video posted by Crowder that contains clips of the phone call.

 

Jeremey from DW -LITERALLY- says Wage Slaves… when Crowder is asking about other upcoming talent being beholden to such a bullshit contract…. Yeah… This shit goes deep.

Anonymous ID: d5e634 Jan. 20, 2023, 8:48 a.m. No.18181336   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>1352

>>18181304

>>18181304

 

Aye… Gaming will be the hardest nut to crack… Because the majority of the people capable of the coding necessary for such technology… are all college trained derp tards that blindly follow the woke.

 

The trick is going to be the same however…

 

It will be finding people willing to bet it all on a different business model… And not beholden to Ad revenue.

 

The key is to find the right Nut Crackers willing to risk it all for the sake of creative freedom.

 

Of course… Right now Bobby Kotick is in some pretty deep shitty water right now with the Microsoft fiasco…

 

That shit's far from over…

Anonymous ID: d5e634 Jan. 20, 2023, 8:50 a.m. No.18181349   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>1359

>>18181313

 

It's not about him though.

 

He even says that himself… It's not about him.

 

It's about the future.

 

If a Business Model can be sustainable without Ad Revenue reliance… It's literally Kryptonite to the DS… Because it's an entity that can't be controlled.